* gcc.dg/old-style-asm-1.c: Count jump_insns instead of labels.

From-SVN: r72698

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2003-10-20  Zdenek Dvorak  <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
+
+	* gcc.dg/old-style-asm-1.c: Count jump_insns instead of labels.
+
 2003-10-20  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
 
 	* gcc.dg/builtins-18.c: Wrap C99 tests with HAVE_C99_RUNTIME.

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/old-style-asm-1.c

 /* PR inline-asm/8832 */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -dP" } */
 
 /* Verify that GCC doesn't optimize
    old style asm instructions.  */
@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ void foo(int v)
 
 /* The purpose of the test below is to check that there are two branches
    in the generated code, supposedly corresponding to the if-statements.
-   Warning: this is fragile and assumes that the generated labels for the
-   branches contain letter "L".  That assumption is generally invalid,
-   because for example it depends on the target macro
-   ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL to generate such a name (as with the default
-   definition).  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "L" 4 } } */
+   It tries to check for jump_insn (set (pc) pattern, so that jump_insns
+   corresponding to return are not taken into account.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?n)jump_insn.*set.*pc" 2 } } */