Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
1e1def1c
Commit
1e1def1c
authored
May 01, 2005
by
Kazu Hirata
Committed by
Kazu Hirata
May 01, 2005
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c: Fix a comment typo.
From-SVN: r99071
parent
2a86f515
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
5 additions
and
1 deletions
+5
-1
gcc/ChangeLog
+4
-0
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
+1
-1
No files found.
gcc/ChangeLog
View file @
1e1def1c
2005-05-01 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c: Fix a comment typo.
2005-01-05 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
2005-01-05 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
* config/arm/arm.h (ARM_EMIT_TRAMPOLINE_CACHE_CLEAR): Define.
* config/arm/arm.h (ARM_EMIT_TRAMPOLINE_CACHE_CLEAR): Define.
...
...
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
View file @
1e1def1c
...
@@ -3708,7 +3708,7 @@ get_computation_cost_at (struct ivopts_data *data,
...
@@ -3708,7 +3708,7 @@ get_computation_cost_at (struct ivopts_data *data,
/* CSTEPI is removed from the offset in case statement is after the
/* CSTEPI is removed from the offset in case statement is after the
increment. If the step is not constant, we use zero instead.
increment. If the step is not constant, we use zero instead.
This is a bit i
n
precise (there is the extra addition), but
This is a bit i
m
precise (there is the extra addition), but
redundancy elimination is likely to transform the code so that
redundancy elimination is likely to transform the code so that
it uses value of the variable before increment anyway,
it uses value of the variable before increment anyway,
so it is not that much unrealistic. */
so it is not that much unrealistic. */
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment