We might modify caches due to us trying to load the configuration to figure out
what kinds of filesystem protections we should have.

We still compare case-insensitively to protect more thoroughly as we don't know
what specifics we'll see on the system and it's the behaviour from git.

When dealing with `core.proectNTFS` and `core.protectHFS` we do check
against `.gitmodules` but we still have a failing test as the non-filesystem
codepath does not check for it.

Any part of the library which asks the question can pass in the mode to have it
checked against `.gitmodules` being a symlink.

This is particularly relevant for adding entries to the index from the worktree
and for checking out files.

This is so we have it available for the path validity checking. In a later
commit we will start rejecting `.gitmodules` files as symlinks.

We may take in names from the middle of a string so we want the caller to let us
know how long the path component is that we should be checking.

We want to reject these as they cause compatibility issues and can lead to git
writing to files outside of the repository.

These will be used by the checkout code to detect them for the particular
filesystem they're on.

These can't go into the public API yet as we don't want to introduce API or ABI
changes in a security release.

Given a path component it knows what to pass to the filesystem-specific
functions so we're protected even from trees which try to use the 8.3 naming
rules to get around us matching on the filename exactly.

The logic and test strings come from the equivalent git change.

It checks against the 8.3 shortname variants, including the one which includes
the checksum as part of its name.

This lets us check for other kinds of reserved files.

Otherwise we would also admit `..\..\foo\bar` as a valid path and fail to
protect Windows users.

Ideally we would check for both separators without the need for the copied
string, but this'll get us over the RCE.

If the we decide that the "name" of the submodule (i.e. its path inside
`.git/modules/`) is trying to escape that directory or otherwise trick us, we
ignore the configuration for that submodule.

This leaves us with a half-configured submodule when looking it up by path, but
it's the same result as if the configuration really were missing.

The name check is potentially more strict than it needs to be, but it lets us
re-use the check we're doing for the checkout. The function that encapsulates
this logic is ready to be exported but we don't want to do that in a security
release so it remains internal for now.

We should pretend such submdules do not exist as it can lead to RCE.

Update the settings to use a specific read-only token for accessing our
test repositories in Bitbucket.

At present, we have three online tests against bitbucket: one which
specifies the credentials in the payload, one which specifies the
correct credentials in the URL and a final one that specifies the
incorrect credentials in the URL.  Bitbucket has begun responding to the
latter test with a 403, which causes us to fail.

Break these three tests into separate tests so that we can skip the
latter until this is resolved on Bitbucket's end or until we can change
the test to a different provider.

v0.26.3 backports

Our curl-based streams make use of the easy curl interface. This
interface automatically initializes and de-initializes the global curl
state by calling out to `curl_global_init` and `curl_global_cleanup`.
Thus, all global state will be repeatedly re-initialized when creating
multiple curl streams in succession. Despite being inefficient, this is
not thread-safe due to `curl_global_init` being not thread-safe itself.
Thus a multi-threaded programing handling multiple curl streams at the
same time is inherently racy.

Fix the issue by globally initializing and cleaning up curl's state.

Instead of laving it uninitialized and relying on luck for it to be non-zero,
let's give it a dummy hash so we make valgrind happy (in this case the hash
comes from `sha1sum </dev/null`.

The win32 C library is compiled cdecl, however when configured with
`STDCALL=ON`, our functions (and function pointers) will use the stdcall
calling convention.  You cannot set a `__stdcall` function pointer to a
`__cdecl` function, so it's easier to just use our `git__strncmp`
instead of sorting that mess out.

Versions of Windows prior to Windows 8 do not enable TLS 1.2 by default,
though support may exist.  Try to enable TLS 1.2 support explicitly on
connections.

This request may fail if the operating system does not have TLS 1.2
support - the initial release of Vista lacks TLS 1.2 support (though
it is available as a software update) and XP completely lacks TLS 1.2
support.  If this request does fail, the HTTP context is still valid,
and still maintains the original protocol support.  So we ignore the
failure from this operation.

For platforms that do not define `WINHTTP_FLAG_SECURE_PROTOCOL_TLS1_1`
and/or `WINHTTP_FLAG_SECURE_PROTOCOL_TLS1_2`.

Include the constants for `WINHTTP_FLAG_SECURE_PROTOCOL_TLS1_1` and
`WINHTTP_FLAG_SECURE_PROTOCOL_TLS1_2` so that they can be used by mingw.

This updates both the `deps/winhttp` framework (for classic mingw) and
adds the defines for mingw64, which does not use that framework.

When both the index _and_ the working directory has changed
permissions on a file permissions on a file - but only the permissions,
such that the contents of the file are identical - ensure that
`git_checkout` updates the permissions to match the checkout target.

When the working directory has changed permissions on a file - but only
the permissions, such that the contents of the file are identical -
ensure that `git_checkout` updates the permissions to match the checkout
target.

When checking out a file, we determine whether the baseline (what we
expect to be in the working directory) actually matches the contents
of the working directory.  This is safe behavior to prevent us from
overwriting changes in the working directory.

We look at the index to optimize this test: if we know that the index
matches the working directory, then we can simply look at the index
data compared to the baseline.

We have historically compared the baseline to the index entry by oid.
However, we must also compare the mode of the two items to ensure that
they are identical.  Otherwise, we will refuse to update the working
directory for a mode change.

A rewritten file can either be classified as a modification of its
contents or of a delete of the complete file followed by an addition of
the new content. This distinction becomes important when we want to
detect renames for rewrites. Given a scenario where a file "a" has been
deleted and another file "b" has been renamed to "a", this should be
detected as a deletion of "a" followed by a rename of "a" -> "b". Thus,
splitting of the original rewrite into a delete/add pair is important
here.

This splitting is represented by a flag we can set at the current delta.
While the flag is already being set in case we want to break rewrites,
we do not do so in case where the `GIT_DIFF_FIND_RENAMES_FROM_REWRITES`
flag is set. This can trigger an assert when we try to match the source
and target deltas.

Fix the issue by setting the `GIT_DIFF_FLAG__TO_SPLIT` flag at the delta
when it is a rename target and `GIT_DIFF_FIND_RENAMES_FROM_REWRITES` is
set.

Add two more scenarios to the "renames" repository. The first scenario
has a major rewrite of a file and a delete of another file, the second
scenario has a deletion of a file and rename of another file to the
deleted file. Both scenarios will be used in the following commit.

While we frequently reuse commit OIDs throughout the file, we do not
have any constants to refer to these commits. Make this a bit easier to
read by giving the commit OIDs somewhat descriptive names of what kind
of commit they refer to.

Our virtual commit must be the last argument to merge-base: since our
algorithm pushes _both_ parents of the virtual commit, it needs to be
the last argument, since merge-base:

> Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the
> merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M

We want to calculate the merge base between the actual commit ("two")
and the virtual commit ("one") - since one actually pushes its parents
to the merge-base calculation, we need to calculate the merge base of
"two" and the parents of one.

Virtual base building: ensure that the virtual base is created and
revwalked in the same way as git.

When the commits being merged have multiple merge bases, reverse the
order when creating the virtual merge base.  This is for compatibility
with git's merge-recursive algorithm, and ensures that we build
identical trees.

Git does this to try to use older merge bases first.  Per 8918b0c:

> It seems to be the only sane way to do it: when a two-head merge is
> done, and the merge-base and one of the two branches agree, the
> merge assumes that the other branch has something new.
>
> If we start creating virtual commits from newer merge-bases, and go
> back to older merge-bases, and then merge with newer commits again,
> chances are that a patch is lost, _because_ the merge-base and the
> head agree on it. Unlikely, yes, but it happened to me.

Provide a simple function to reverse an oidarray.