In the testcase below, during specialization of c<int>::d, we build two
identical specializations of the parameter type b<decltype(e)::k> -- one when
substituting into c<int>::d's TYPE_ARG_TYPES and another when substituting into
c<int>::d's DECL_ARGUMENTS.

We don't reuse the first specialization the second time around as a consequence
of the fix for PR c++/56247 which made PARM_DECLs always compare different from
one another during spec_hasher::equal.  As a result, when looking up existing
specializations of 'b', spec_hasher::equal considers the template argument
decltype(e')::k to be different from decltype(e'')::k, where e' and e'' are the
result of two calls to tsubst_copy on the PARM_DECL e.

Since the two specializations are considered different due to the mentioned fix,
their TYPE_CANONICAL points to themselves even though they are otherwise
identical types, and this triggers an ICE in maybe_rebuild_function_decl_type
when comparing the TYPE_ARG_TYPES of c<int>::d to its DECL_ARGUMENTS.

This patch fixes this issue at the spec_hasher::equal level by ignoring the
'comparing_specializations' flag in cp_tree_equal whenever the DECL_CONTEXTs of
the two parameters are identical.  This seems to be a sufficient condition to be
able to correctly compare PARM_DECLs structurally.  (This also subsumes the
CONSTRAINT_VAR_P check since constraint variables all have empty, and therefore
identical, DECL_CONTEXTs.)

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/94632
	* tree.c (cp_tree_equal) <case PARM_DECL>: Ignore
	comparing_specializations if the parameters' contexts are identical.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/94632
	* g++.dg/template/canon-type-14.C: New test.