Consider the test case g++.dg/other/offsetof5.C:

    #include <stddef.h>

    struct A
    {
      char c;
      int &i;
    };

    int j = offsetof (A, i);		// { dg-warning "invalid access|offsetof" }

    template <typename T>
    struct S
    {
      T h;
      T &i;
      static const int j = offsetof (S, i);	// { dg-warning "invalid access|offsetof" }
    };

    int k = S<int>::j;			// { dg-message "required from here" }

The second warning (that involves the instantiation of the S template)
is not emitted when -ftrack-macro-expansion is on.

This is because during the instantiation of the member j of S
template, the location that is used for the warning is the one for the
DECL j (set by instantiate_decl).  And that location is inaccurately
set to the locus of 'offsetof', which is a macro defined in a system
header, so it's discarded by the diagnostics machinery.

Note that when we reach the point where we emit the warning in
build_class_member_access_expr offsetof expression has long been
folded, so we cannot use e.g, the location of the ')' token that would
have been in the source code.  So I believe the location of 'j' is the
best we can get at this point.

The patch below sets the location of the DECL for 'j' to what I
believe is its precise location; with that, the test case passes with
and without -ftrack-macro-expansion.  But I had to adjust
g++.dg/template/sfinae6_neg.C for that.

Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.

gcc/cp

	* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Use the location carried by the
	declarator for the DECL of the static class member.

gcc/testsuite/

	* g++.dg/template/sfinae6_neg.C: Adjust.

From-SVN: r186974