New g77 tests

From-SVN: r25745

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+1999-03-13  Craig Burley  <craig@jcb-sc.com>
+
+	* g77.f-torture/execute/19990313-0.f: New test.
+	* g77.f-torture/execute/19990313-1.f: New test.
+
 1999-03-08  Craig Burley  <craig@jcb-sc.com>
 
 	* g77.f-torture/execute/19981119-0.f: Improve testiness.

gcc/testsuite/g77.f-torture/execute/19990313-0.f

+* To: craig@jcb-sc.com
+* Subject: Re: G77 and KIND=2
+* Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+* From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
+* Date: 03 Mar 1999 18:20:11 +0000
+* In-Reply-To: craig@jcb-sc.com's message of "1 Mar 1999 21:04:38 -0000"
+* User-Agent: Gnus/5.07007 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.70) Emacs/20.3
+* X-UIDL: d442bafe961c2a6ec6904f492e05d7b0
+* 
+* ISTM that there is a real problem printing integer*8 (on x86):
+* 
+* $ cat x.f
+*[modified for test suite]
+        integer *8 foo, bar
+        data r/4e10/
+        foo = 4e10
+        bar = r
+        if (foo .ne. bar) call abort
+        end
+* $ g77 x.f && ./a.out
+*  1345294336
+*  123
+* $ f2c x.f && g77 x.c && ./a.out
+* x.f:
+*    MAIN:
+*  40000000000
+*  123
+* $
+* 
+* Gdb shows the upper half of the buffer passed to do_lio is zeroed in
+* the g77 case.
+* 
+* I've forgotten how the code generation happens.

gcc/testsuite/g77.f-torture/execute/19990313-1.f

+        integer *8 foo, bar
+	double precision r
+        data r/4d10/
+        foo = 4d10
+        bar = r
+        if (foo .ne. bar) call abort
+        end