Commit faca0670 by Adam Butcher Committed by Adam Butcher

* pt.c: Grammar fix in comments ("it's" to "its").

From-SVN: r201674
parent d445d18d
2013-08-13 Adam Butcher <adam@jessamine.co.uk>
* pt.c: Grammar fix in comments ("it's" to "its").
2013-08-12 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> 2013-08-12 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
* decl.c (warn_extern_redeclared_static, duplicate_decls, * decl.c (warn_extern_redeclared_static, duplicate_decls,
......
...@@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id, ...@@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id,
tree decl_arg_types; tree decl_arg_types;
/* This is an ordinary member function. However, since /* This is an ordinary member function. However, since
we're here, we can assume it's enclosing class is a we're here, we can assume its enclosing class is a
template class. For example, template class. For example,
template <typename T> struct S { void f(); }; template <typename T> struct S { void f(); };
...@@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree parms, bool is_primary, ...@@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree parms, bool is_primary,
|| DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl))) || DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
/* We already checked these parameters when the template was /* We already checked these parameters when the template was
declared, so there's no need to do it again now. This function declared, so there's no need to do it again now. This function
was defined in class scope, but we're processing it's body now was defined in class scope, but we're processing its body now
that the class is complete. */ that the class is complete. */
return true; return true;
...@@ -7555,7 +7555,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context, ...@@ -7555,7 +7555,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
the one of #0. the one of #0.
When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial instantiation When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial instantiation
of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in it's CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE. of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in its CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of member of a For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of member of a
class template", we just want to store the most general template into class template", we just want to store the most general template into
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment