md.texi (Expander Definitions): Use @emph instead of @strong around Note...

	* doc/md.texi (Expander Definitions): Use @emph instead of @strong
	around Note: text to workaround a limitation of the Info format.
	* doc/cpp.texi (Invocation): Likewise.
	* doc/cppopts.texi: Likewise.

From-SVN: r92411

gcc/ChangeLog

+2004-12-20  Ben Elliston  <bje@au.ibm.com>
+
+	* doc/md.texi (Expander Definitions): Use @emph instead of @strong
+	around Note: text to workaround a limitation of the Info format.
+	* doc/cpp.texi (Invocation): Likewise.
+	* doc/cppopts.texi: Likewise.
+
 2004-12-19  Dale Johannesen  <dalej@apple.com>
 
 	* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (contains_abnormal_ssa_name_p):  Don't

gcc/doc/cpp.texi

@@ -4133,7 +4133,7 @@ here are also acceptable to the C compiler and have the same meaning,
 except that the C compiler has different rules for specifying the output
 file.
 
-@strong{Note:} Whether you use the preprocessor by way of @command{gcc}
+@emph{Note:} Whether you use the preprocessor by way of @command{gcc}
 or @command{cpp}, the @dfn{compiler driver} is run first.  This
 program's purpose is to translate your command into invocations of the
 programs that do the actual work.  Their command line interfaces are

gcc/doc/cppopts.texi

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ time it is redefined or undefined.
 Built-in macros, macros defined on the command line, and macros
 defined in include files are not warned about.
 
-@strong{Note:} If a macro is actually used, but only used in skipped
+@emph{Note:} If a macro is actually used, but only used in skipped
 conditional blocks, then CPP will report it as unused.  To avoid the
 warning in such a case, you might improve the scope of the macro's
 definition by, for example, moving it into the first skipped block.
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ extensions for C++ and assembly are also recognized.  If cpp does not
 recognize the extension, it will treat the file as C; this is the most
 generic mode.
 
-@strong{Note:} Previous versions of cpp accepted a @option{-lang} option
+@emph{Note:} Previous versions of cpp accepted a @option{-lang} option
 which selected both the language and the standards conformance level.
 This option has been removed, because it conflicts with the @option{-l}
 option.

gcc/doc/md.texi

@@ -4511,7 +4511,7 @@ on this machine.  So it must be copied into a register with
      = force_reg (SImode, GEN_INT (65535)); ")
 @end smallexample
 
-@strong{Note:} If the @code{define_expand} is used to serve a
+@emph{Note:} If the @code{define_expand} is used to serve a
 standard binary or unary arithmetic operation or a bit-field operation,
 then the last insn it generates must not be a @code{code_label},
 @code{barrier} or @code{note}.  It must be an @code{insn},