re PR target/57744 (Power8 support has problems with quad word atomic instructions)

[gcc]
2013-06-28  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

	PR target/57744
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (MODES_TIEABLE_P): Do not allow PTImode
	to tie with any other modes.  Eliminate Altivec vector mode tests,
	since these are a subset of ALTIVEC or VSX vector modes.  Simplify
	code, to return 0 if testing MODE2 for a condition, if we've
	already tested MODE1 for the same condition.

[gcc/testsuite]
2013-06-28  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

	PR target/57744
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr57744.c: New test to make sure lqarx and
	stqcx. get even registers.

From-SVN: r200538

gcc/ChangeLog

+2013-06-28  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+	PR target/57744
+	* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (MODES_TIEABLE_P): Do not allow PTImode
+	to tie with any other modes.  Eliminate Altivec vector mode tests,
+	since these are a subset of ALTIVEC or VSX vector modes.  Simplify
+	code, to return 0 if testing MODE2 for a condition, if we've
+	already tested MODE1 for the same condition.
+
 2013-06-28  Marcus Shawcroft  <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>
 
 	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_cannot_force_const_mem): Adjust

gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h

@@ -1180,28 +1180,32 @@ enum data_align { align_abi, align_opt, align_both };
 /* Value is 1 if it is a good idea to tie two pseudo registers
    when one has mode MODE1 and one has mode MODE2.
    If HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK could produce different values for MODE1 and MODE2,
-   for any hard reg, then this must be 0 for correct output.  */
+   for any hard reg, then this must be 0 for correct output.
+
+   PTImode cannot tie with other modes because PTImode is restricted to even
+   GPR registers, and TImode can go in any GPR as well as VSX registers (PR
+   57744).  */
 #define MODES_TIEABLE_P(MODE1, MODE2)		\
-  (SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (MODE1)			\
+  ((MODE1) == PTImode				\
+   ? (MODE2) == PTImode				\
+   : (MODE2) == PTImode				\
+   ? 0						\
+   : SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (MODE1)		\
    ? SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (MODE2)		\
    : SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (MODE2)		\
-   ? SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (MODE1)		\
+   ? 0						\
    : GET_MODE_CLASS (MODE1) == MODE_CC		\
    ? GET_MODE_CLASS (MODE2) == MODE_CC		\
    : GET_MODE_CLASS (MODE2) == MODE_CC		\
-   ? GET_MODE_CLASS (MODE1) == MODE_CC		\
+   ? 0						\
    : SPE_VECTOR_MODE (MODE1)			\
    ? SPE_VECTOR_MODE (MODE2)			\
    : SPE_VECTOR_MODE (MODE2)			\
-   ? SPE_VECTOR_MODE (MODE1)			\
+   ? 0						\
    : ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_VECTOR_MODE (MODE1)		\
    ? ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_VECTOR_MODE (MODE2)		\
    : ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_VECTOR_MODE (MODE2)		\
-   ? ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_VECTOR_MODE (MODE1)		\
-   : ALTIVEC_VECTOR_MODE (MODE1)		\
-   ? ALTIVEC_VECTOR_MODE (MODE2)		\
-   : ALTIVEC_VECTOR_MODE (MODE2)		\
-   ? ALTIVEC_VECTOR_MODE (MODE1)		\
+   ? 0						\
    : 1)
 
 /* Post-reload, we can't use any new AltiVec registers, as we already

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2013-06-28  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+	PR target/57744
+	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr57744.c: New test to make sure lqarx and
+	stqcx. get even registers.
+
 2013-06-28  Marc Glisse  <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
 
 	PR c++/57509

gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr57744.c

+/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcpu=power8 -O3" } */
+
+typedef unsigned U_16 __attribute__((mode(TI)));
+
+extern int libat_compare_exchange_16 (U_16 *, U_16 *, U_16, int, int)
+  __attribute__((__noinline__));
+
+/* PR 57744: lqarx/stqcx needs even/odd register pairs.  The assembler will
+   complain if the compiler gets an odd/even register pair.  Create a function
+   which has the 16 byte compare and exchange instructions, but don't actually
+   execute it, so that we can detect these failures on older machines. */
+
+int
+libat_compare_exchange_16 (U_16 *mptr, U_16 *eptr, U_16 newval,
+         int smodel, int fmodel __attribute__((unused)))
+{
+  if (((smodel) == 0))
+    return __atomic_compare_exchange_n (mptr, eptr, newval, 0, 0, 0);
+  else if (((smodel) != 5))
+    return __atomic_compare_exchange_n (mptr, eptr, newval, 0, 4, 0);
+  else
+    return __atomic_compare_exchange_n (mptr, eptr, newval, 0, 5, 0);
+}
+
+U_16 a = 1, b = 1, c = -2;
+volatile int do_test = 0;
+
+int main (void)
+{
+  if (do_test && !libat_compare_exchange_16 (&a, &b, c, 0, 0))
+    aborrt ();
+
+  return 0;
+}