automatic arrays reportedly working on HP-UX systems

From-SVN: r26803

gcc/f/ChangeLog

+Thu May  6 08:23:52 1999  Craig Burley  <craig@jcb-sc.com>
+
+	* bugs.texi, news.texi: Automatic arrays reportedly working
+	on HP-UX systems.
+
 Thu May  6 08:19:31 1999  Craig Burley  <craig@jcb-sc.com>
 
 	* g77.texi (Advantages Over f2c): Expand on this topic.

gcc/f/bugs.texi

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 @c in the standalone derivations of this file (e.g. BUGS).
 @set copyrights-bugs 1995-1999
 
-@set last-update-bugs 1999-04-20
+@set last-update-bugs 1999-05-06
 
 @include root.texi
 
@@ -98,16 +98,6 @@ The following information was last updated on @value{last-update-bugs}:
 
 @itemize @bullet
 @item
-@c Tim Prince discovered this.
-Automatic arrays possibly aren't working on HP-UX systems,
-at least in HP-UX version 10.20.
-Writing into them apparently causes over-writing
-of statically declared data in the main program.
-This probably means the arrays themselves are being under-allocated,
-or pointers to them being improperly handled,
-e.g. not passed to other procedures as they should be.
-
-@item
 @code{g77} fails to warn about
 use of a ``live'' iterative-DO variable
 as an implied-DO variable

gcc/f/news.texi

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 @c in the standalone derivations of this file (e.g. NEWS).
 @set copyrights-news 1995-1999
 
-@set last-update-news 1999-05-03
+@set last-update-news 1999-05-06
 
 @include root.texi
 
@@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ in cases where such partial overlap is deemed possible.
 
 @ifclear USERVISONLY
 @item
+@c Tim Prince reported this, regarding the TEST_FPU benchmark.
+Automatic arrays now seem to be working on HP-UX systems.
+@end ifclear
+
+@ifclear USERVISONLY
+@item
 Fix @code{g77} so it no longer crashes when compiling
 I/O statements using keywords that define @code{INTEGER} values,
 such as @samp{IOSTAT=@var{j}},