Commit ee88e690 by Eric Botcazou Committed by Eric Botcazou

re PR rtl-optimization/55388 (ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423)

	PR rtl-optimization/55388
	* alias.c (nonoverlapping_component_refs_p): Handle bitfields.
	* emit-rtl.c (adjust_address_1): Deal with VOIDmode early.
	* expmed.c (store_bit_field): Turn the call to adjust_address
	into a call to adjust_bitfield_address_size.

From-SVN: r193760
parent afa22e29
2012-11-23 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
PR rtl-optimization/55388
* alias.c (nonoverlapping_component_refs_p): Handle bitfields.
* emit-rtl.c (adjust_address_1): Deal with VOIDmode early.
* expmed.c (store_bit_field): Turn the call to adjust_address
into a call to adjust_bitfield_address_size.
2012-11-23 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> 2012-11-23 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
* lra.c (lra): Move init_reg_info and expand_reg_info calls before * lra.c (lra): Move init_reg_info and expand_reg_info calls before
...@@ -2236,11 +2236,20 @@ nonoverlapping_component_refs_p (const_rtx rtlx, const_rtx rtly) ...@@ -2236,11 +2236,20 @@ nonoverlapping_component_refs_p (const_rtx rtlx, const_rtx rtly)
return false; return false;
found: found:
/* If we're left with accessing different fields of a structure, /* If we're left with accessing different fields of a structure, then no
then no overlap. */ possible overlap, unless they are both true bitfields, i.e. bitfields
if (TREE_CODE (typex) == RECORD_TYPE for which the size isn't a multiple of the (memory) unit. */
&& fieldx != fieldy) if (TREE_CODE (typex) == RECORD_TYPE && fieldx != fieldy)
return true; {
if (!DECL_BIT_FIELD (fieldx) || !DECL_BIT_FIELD (fieldy))
return true;
if ((tree_low_cst (DECL_SIZE (fieldx), 1) % BITS_PER_UNIT) == 0
|| (tree_low_cst (DECL_SIZE (fieldy), 1) % BITS_PER_UNIT) == 0)
return true;
return false;
}
/* The comparison on the current field failed. If we're accessing /* The comparison on the current field failed. If we're accessing
a very nested structure, look at the next outer level. */ a very nested structure, look at the next outer level. */
......
...@@ -2072,6 +2072,10 @@ adjust_address_1 (rtx memref, enum machine_mode mode, HOST_WIDE_INT offset, ...@@ -2072,6 +2072,10 @@ adjust_address_1 (rtx memref, enum machine_mode mode, HOST_WIDE_INT offset,
= targetm.addr_space.pointer_mode (attrs.addrspace); = targetm.addr_space.pointer_mode (attrs.addrspace);
#endif #endif
/* VOIDmode means no mode change for change_address_1. */
if (mode == VOIDmode)
mode = GET_MODE (memref);
/* Take the size of non-BLKmode accesses from the mode. */ /* Take the size of non-BLKmode accesses from the mode. */
defattrs = mode_mem_attrs[(int) mode]; defattrs = mode_mem_attrs[(int) mode];
if (defattrs->size_known_p) if (defattrs->size_known_p)
......
...@@ -869,19 +869,20 @@ store_bit_field (rtx str_rtx, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitsize, ...@@ -869,19 +869,20 @@ store_bit_field (rtx str_rtx, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitsize,
if (MEM_P (str_rtx) && bitregion_start > 0) if (MEM_P (str_rtx) && bitregion_start > 0)
{ {
enum machine_mode bestmode; enum machine_mode bestmode;
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT offset; HOST_WIDE_INT offset, size;
gcc_assert ((bitregion_start % BITS_PER_UNIT) == 0); gcc_assert ((bitregion_start % BITS_PER_UNIT) == 0);
offset = bitregion_start / BITS_PER_UNIT; offset = bitregion_start / BITS_PER_UNIT;
bitnum -= bitregion_start; bitnum -= bitregion_start;
size = (bitnum + bitsize + BITS_PER_UNIT - 1) / BITS_PER_UNIT;
bitregion_end -= bitregion_start; bitregion_end -= bitregion_start;
bitregion_start = 0; bitregion_start = 0;
bestmode = get_best_mode (bitsize, bitnum, bestmode = get_best_mode (bitsize, bitnum,
bitregion_start, bitregion_end, bitregion_start, bitregion_end,
MEM_ALIGN (str_rtx), VOIDmode, MEM_ALIGN (str_rtx), VOIDmode,
MEM_VOLATILE_P (str_rtx)); MEM_VOLATILE_P (str_rtx));
str_rtx = adjust_address (str_rtx, bestmode, offset); str_rtx = adjust_bitfield_address_size (str_rtx, bestmode, offset, size);
} }
if (!store_bit_field_1 (str_rtx, bitsize, bitnum, if (!store_bit_field_1 (str_rtx, bitsize, bitnum,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment