Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
ed29e24b
Commit
ed29e24b
authored
May 11, 2016
by
Martin Sebor
Committed by
Martin Sebor
May 10, 2016
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
PR c++/38611 - missing -Wattributes on a typedef with attribute aligned
From-SVN: r236112
parent
c8acbe37
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
25 additions
and
0 deletions
+25
-0
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+5
-0
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wattributes.C
+20
-0
No files found.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
View file @
ed29e24b
2016-05-10 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
PR c++/38611
* g++.dg/Wattributes.C: New test.
2016-05-10 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bit-assoc.c: New testcase.
...
...
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wattributes.C
0 → 100644
View file @
ed29e24b
// PR c++/38611
// { dg-do compile }
struct
A
{
unsigned
char
a
[
272
];
};
typedef
struct
__attribute__
((
aligned
(
128
)))
A
B
;
// { dg-warning "attributes ignored" }
typedef
struct
__attribute__
((
__may_alias__
))
A
C
;
// { dg-warning "attributes ignored" }
#ifndef __cplusplus
# define alignof _Alignof
# define static_assert _Static_assert
#elif __cplusplus < 201103L
# define alignof __alignof__
# define static_assert(expr, ignore) typedef int Assert [(expr) ? 1 : -1]
#endif
#define SA(expr) static_assert ((expr), #expr)
SA
(
alignof
(
struct
A
)
==
alignof
(
B
));
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment