Skip to content

R
riscv-gcc-1
Commit e19bb186 by Tobias Burnus Committed by Tobias Burnus
Options

re PR fortran/35033 (Valid ASSIGNMENT(=) rejected) 

2008-02-26  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/35033
        * interface.c (check_operator_interface): Show better line for
        * error
        messages; fix constrains for user-defined assignment operators.
        (gfc_extend_assign): Fix constrains for user-defined assignment
        operators.

2008-02-26  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/35033
        * gfortran.dg/assignment_2.f90: New.

From-SVN: r132689
parent f5c630c3
Showing with 80 additions and 12 deletions
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2008-02-26 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/35033
* interface.c (check_operator_interface): Show better line for error
messages; fix constrains for user-defined assignment operators.
(gfc_extend_assign): Fix constrains for user-defined assignment
operators.
2008-02-26 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* trans-io.c (set_error_locus): Remove old location code.
......
gcc/fortran/interface.c
......@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ check_operator_interface (gfc_interface *intr, gfc_intrinsic_op operator)
if (sym == NULL)
{
gfc_error ("Alternate return cannot appear in operator "
"interface at %L", &intr->where);
"interface at %L", &intr->sym->declared_at);
return;
}
if (args == 0)
......@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ check_operator_interface (gfc_interface *intr, gfc_intrinsic_op operator)
|| (args == 2 && operator == INTRINSIC_NOT))
{
gfc_error ("Operator interface at %L has the wrong number of arguments",
&intr->where);
&intr->sym->declared_at);
return;
}
......@@ -602,23 +602,28 @@ check_operator_interface (gfc_interface *intr, gfc_intrinsic_op operator)
if (!sym->attr.subroutine)
{
gfc_error ("Assignment operator interface at %L must be "
"a SUBROUTINE", &intr->where);
"a SUBROUTINE", &intr->sym->declared_at);
return;
}
if (args != 2)
{
gfc_error ("Assignment operator interface at %L must have "
"two arguments", &intr->where);
"two arguments", &intr->sym->declared_at);
return;
}
/* Allowed are (per F2003, 12.3.2.1.2 Defined assignments):
- First argument an array with different rank than second,
- Types and kinds do not conform, and
- First argument is of derived type. */
if (sym->formal->sym->ts.type != BT_DERIVED
&& sym->formal->next->sym->ts.type != BT_DERIVED
&& (r1 == 0 || r1 == r2)
&& (sym->formal->sym->ts.type == sym->formal->next->sym->ts.type
|| (gfc_numeric_ts (&sym->formal->sym->ts)
&& gfc_numeric_ts (&sym->formal->next->sym->ts))))
{
gfc_error ("Assignment operator interface at %L must not redefine "
"an INTRINSIC type assignment", &intr->where);
"an INTRINSIC type assignment", &intr->sym->declared_at);
return;
}
}
......@@ -627,7 +632,7 @@ check_operator_interface (gfc_interface *intr, gfc_intrinsic_op operator)
if (!sym->attr.function)
{
gfc_error ("Intrinsic operator interface at %L must be a FUNCTION",
&intr->where);
&intr->sym->declared_at);
return;
}
}
......@@ -637,21 +642,21 @@ check_operator_interface (gfc_interface *intr, gfc_intrinsic_op operator)
{
if (i1 != INTENT_OUT && i1 != INTENT_INOUT)
gfc_error ("First argument of defined assignment at %L must be "
"INTENT(IN) or INTENT(INOUT)", &intr->where);
"INTENT(OUT) or INTENT(INOUT)", &intr->sym->declared_at);
if (i2 != INTENT_IN)
gfc_error ("Second argument of defined assignment at %L must be "
"INTENT(IN)", &intr->where);
"INTENT(IN)", &intr->sym->declared_at);
}
else
{
if (i1 != INTENT_IN)
gfc_error ("First argument of operator interface at %L must be "
"INTENT(IN)", &intr->where);
"INTENT(IN)", &intr->sym->declared_at);
if (args == 2 && i2 != INTENT_IN)
gfc_error ("Second argument of operator interface at %L must be "
"INTENT(IN)", &intr->where);
"INTENT(IN)", &intr->sym->declared_at);
}
/* From now on, all we have to do is check that the operator definition
......@@ -2654,7 +2659,8 @@ gfc_extend_assign (gfc_code *c, gfc_namespace *ns)
rhs = c->expr2;
/* Don't allow an intrinsic assignment to be replaced. */
if (lhs->ts.type != BT_DERIVED && rhs->ts.type != BT_DERIVED
if (lhs->ts.type != BT_DERIVED
&& (rhs->rank == 0 || rhs->rank == lhs->rank)
&& (lhs->ts.type == rhs->ts.type
|| (gfc_numeric_ts (&lhs->ts) && gfc_numeric_ts (&rhs->ts))))
return FAILURE;
......
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2008-02-26 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/35033
* gfortran.dg/assignment_2.f90: New.
2008-02-26 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/35315
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assignment_2.f90 0 → 100644
! { dg-do compile }
!
! PR fortran/35033
!
! The checks for assignments were too strict.
!
MODULE m1
INTERFACE ASSIGNMENT(=)
SUBROUTINE s(a,b)
REAL,INTENT(OUT) :: a(1,*)
REAL,INTENT(IN) :: b(:)
END SUBROUTINE
END Interface
contains
subroutine test1()
REAL,POINTER :: p(:,:),q(:)
CALL s(p,q)
p = q
end subroutine test1
end module m1
MODULE m2
INTERFACE ASSIGNMENT(=)
SUBROUTINE s(a,b)
REAL,INTENT(OUT),VOLATILE :: a(1,*)
REAL,INTENT(IN) :: b(:)
END SUBROUTINE
END Interface
contains
subroutine test1()
REAL,POINTER :: p(:,:),q(:)
CALL s(p,q) ! { dg-error "requires an assumed-shape or pointer-array dummy" }
!TODO: The following is rightly rejected but the error message is misleading.
! The actual reason is the mismatch between pointer array and VOLATILE
p = q ! { dg-error "Incompatible ranks" }
end subroutine test1
end module m2
MODULE m3
INTERFACE ASSIGNMENT(=)
module procedure s ! { dg-error "must not redefine an INTRINSIC type" }
END Interface
contains
SUBROUTINE s(a,b)
REAL,INTENT(OUT),VOLATILE :: a(1,*)
REAL,INTENT(IN) :: b(:,:)
END SUBROUTINE
end module m3
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment