*** empty log message ***

From-SVN: r405

gcc/config/a29k/a29k.h

@@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ extern int target_flags;
    && TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (TYPE)) == QImode	\
    && (ALIGN) < BITS_PER_WORD ? BITS_PER_WORD : (ALIGN))
 
-/* Define this if move instructions will actually fail to work
+/* Set this non-zero if move instructions will actually fail to work
    when given unaligned data.  */
-/* #define STRICT_ALIGNMENT */
+#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 0
 
-/* Define this if unaligned move instructions are extremely slow.
+/* Set this non-zero if unaligned move instructions are extremely slow.
 
    On the 29k, they trap.  */
-#define SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+#define SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS 1
 
 /* Standard register usage.  */
 

gcc/config/m68k/mot3300.h

@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ the Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.  */
 
 #define TARGET_MEM_FUNCTIONS
 
+/ * size_t is unsigned int.  */
+
+#define SIZE_TYPE "unsigned int"
+
 /* Every structure or union's size must be a multiple of 2 bytes.  */
 
 #define STRUCTURE_SIZE_BOUNDARY 16

gcc/config/ns32k/ns32k.h

@@ -153,11 +153,11 @@ extern int target_flags;
 /* No data type wants to be aligned rounder than this.  */
 #define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT 32
 
-/* Define this if move instructions will actually fail to work
+/* Set this nonzero if move instructions will actually fail to work
    when given unaligned data.  National claims that the NS32032
    works without strict alignment, but rumor has it that operands
    crossing a page boundary cause unpredictable results.  */
-#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT
+#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 1
 
 /* If bit field type is int, dont let it cross an int,
    and give entire struct the alignment of an int.  */

gcc/config/ns32k/pc532.h

@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ the Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.  */
    if the bug still exists. */
 
 #undef STRICT_ALIGNMENT
+#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 0
 
 /* Maybe someone needs to know which processor we're running on */