* decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.

From-SVN: r106533

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

+2005-11-05  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.
+
 2005-11-04  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
 
 	PR c++/22487

gcc/cp/decl2.c

@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ get_priority_info (int priority)
 	((!DECL_HAS_INIT_PRIORITY_P (decl) || DECL_INIT_PRIORITY (decl) == 0) \
 	 ? DEFAULT_INIT_PRIORITY : DECL_INIT_PRIORITY (decl))
 
-/* Wether a DECL needs a guard to protect it against multiple
+/* Whether a DECL needs a guard to protect it against multiple
    initialization.  */
 
 #define NEEDS_GUARD_P(decl) (TREE_PUBLIC (decl) && (DECL_COMMON (decl)      \

gcc/cp/init.c

@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool integral_p)
 	      : (!TREE_CONSTANT (init)
 		 /* Do not return an aggregate constant (of which
 		    string literals are a special case), as we do not
-		    want to make inadvertant copies of such entities,
+		    want to make inadvertent copies of such entities,
 		    and we must be sure that their addresses are the
 		    same everywhere.  */
 		 || TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR

gcc/cp/typeck.c

@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ check_template_keyword (tree decl)
      DR 228 removed the restriction that the template be a member
      template.  
      
-     DR 96, if accepted would add the further restriction that explcit
+     DR 96, if accepted would add the further restriction that explicit
      template arguments must be provided if the template keyword is
      used, but, as of 2005-10-16, that DR is still in "drafting".  If
      this DR is accepted, then the semantic checks here can be