re PR middle-end/11665 (ICE in struct initializer when taking address)

2003-09-07  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>

        PR middle-end/11665
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/20030907-1.c: New test.
        * g++.dg/init/array11.C: New test.

From-SVN: r71193

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2003-09-07  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
+
+	PR middle-end/11665
+	* gcc.c-torture/compile/20030907-1.c: New test.
+	* g++.dg/init/array11.C: New test.
+
 2003-09-07  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 	PR c++/11852

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array11.C

+/* PR 11665 
+   Orgin: jwhite@cse.unl.edu
+   The problem was in initializer_constant_valid_p,
+   "for a CONSTRUCTOR, only the last element
+   of the CONSTRUCTOR was being checked" 
+   (from the email of the patch which fixed this).  
+   This used to ICE because GCC thought gdt_table was a 
+   constant value when it is not.  */
+
+int x;
+struct gdt
+{
+unsigned a,b,c,d,e,f;
+};
+void f()
+{
+struct gdt gdt_table[2]=
+{
+    {
+		0,
+		( (((unsigned)(&x))<<(24))&(-1<<(8)) ),
+    },
+};
+}
+

gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20030907-1.c

+/* PR 11665 
+   Orgin: jwhite@cse.unl.edu
+   The problem was in initializer_constant_valid_p,
+   "for a CONSTRUCTOR, only the last element
+   of the CONSTRUCTOR was being checked" 
+   (from the email of the patch which fixed this).  
+   This used to ICE because GCC thought gdt_table was a 
+   constant value when it is not.  */
+
+int x;
+struct gdt
+{
+unsigned a,b,c,d,e,f;
+};
+void f()
+{
+struct gdt gdt_table[2]=
+{
+    {
+		0,
+		( (((unsigned)(&x))<<(24))&(-1<<(8)) ),
+    },
+};
+}
+