Skip to content

R
riscv-gcc-1
Commit d1c9693e by Vladimir Makarov Committed by Vladimir Makarov
Options

sched-deps.c (reg_pending_barrier_mode): New enumeration. 

2003-04-09  Vladimir Makarov  <vmakarov@redhat.com>

	* sched-deps.c (reg_pending_barrier_mode): New enumeration.
	(reg_pending_barrier): Make it of the enumeration type.
	(sched_analyze_2): Define the barrier as MOVE_BARRIER or
	TRUE_BARRIER.
	(sched_analyze): Ditto.
	(sched_analyze_insn): Ditto.  Use anti-dependencies for
	MOVE_BARRIER and true-dependencies as TRUE_BARRIER.
	(init_deps_global): Initialize the barrier as NO_BARRIER.

From-SVN: r65402
parent f32360c7
Showing with 43 additions and 15 deletions
gcc/ChangeLog
2003-04-09 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
* sched-deps.c (reg_pending_barrier_mode): New enumeration.
(reg_pending_barrier): Make it of the enumeration type.
(sched_analyze_2): Define the barrier as MOVE_BARRIER or
TRUE_BARRIER.
(sched_analyze): Ditto.
(sched_analyze_insn): Ditto. Use anti-dependencies for
MOVE_BARRIER and true-dependencies as TRUE_BARRIER.
(init_deps_global): Initialize the barrier as NO_BARRIER.
2003-04-09 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
* config/ia64/ia64.c (issue_nops_and_insn): Add new parameter.
Check that asm insn starts on a new cycle. Add nops after asm
insn to end bundle.
......
gcc/sched-deps.c
......@@ -54,7 +54,18 @@ static regset_head reg_pending_uses_head;
static regset reg_pending_sets;
static regset reg_pending_clobbers;
static regset reg_pending_uses;
static bool reg_pending_barrier;
/* The following enumeration values tell us what dependencies we
should use to implement the barrier. We use true-dependencies for
TRUE_BARRIER and anti-dependencies for MOVE_BARRIER. */
enum reg_pending_barrier_mode
{
NOT_A_BARRIER = 0,
MOVE_BARRIER,
TRUE_BARRIER
};
static enum reg_pending_barrier_mode reg_pending_barrier;
/* To speed up the test for duplicate dependency links we keep a
record of dependencies created by add_dependence when the average
......@@ -748,7 +759,7 @@ sched_analyze_2 (deps, x, insn)
mode. An insn should not be moved across this even if it only uses
pseudo-regs because it might give an incorrectly rounded result. */
if (code != ASM_OPERANDS || MEM_VOLATILE_P (x))
reg_pending_barrier = true;
reg_pending_barrier = TRUE_BARRIER;
/* For all ASM_OPERANDS, we must traverse the vector of input operands.
We can not just fall through here since then we would be confused
......@@ -867,7 +878,7 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
sched_analyze_2 (deps, XEXP (link, 0), insn);
}
if (find_reg_note (insn, REG_SETJMP, NULL))
reg_pending_barrier = true;
reg_pending_barrier = MOVE_BARRIER;
}
if (GET_CODE (insn) == JUMP_INSN)
......@@ -875,7 +886,7 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
rtx next;
next = next_nonnote_insn (insn);
if (next && GET_CODE (next) == BARRIER)
reg_pending_barrier = true;
reg_pending_barrier = TRUE_BARRIER;
else
{
rtx pending, pending_mem;
......@@ -940,7 +951,7 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
|| INTVAL (XEXP (link, 0)) == NOTE_INSN_LOOP_END
|| INTVAL (XEXP (link, 0)) == NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION_BEG
|| INTVAL (XEXP (link, 0)) == NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION_END)
reg_pending_barrier = true;
reg_pending_barrier = MOVE_BARRIER;
link = XEXP (link, 1);
}
......@@ -952,7 +963,7 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
where block boundaries fall. This is mighty confusing elsewhere.
Therefore, prevent such an instruction from being moved. */
if (can_throw_internal (insn))
reg_pending_barrier = true;
reg_pending_barrier = MOVE_BARRIER;
/* Add dependencies if a scheduling barrier was found. */
if (reg_pending_barrier)
......@@ -965,8 +976,12 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
{
struct deps_reg *reg_last = &deps->reg_last[i];
add_dependence_list (insn, reg_last->uses, REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list (insn, reg_last->sets, REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list (insn, reg_last->clobbers, REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list
(insn, reg_last->sets,
reg_pending_barrier == TRUE_BARRIER ? 0 : REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list
(insn, reg_last->clobbers,
reg_pending_barrier == TRUE_BARRIER ? 0 : REG_DEP_ANTI);
});
}
else
......@@ -976,10 +991,12 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
struct deps_reg *reg_last = &deps->reg_last[i];
add_dependence_list_and_free (insn, &reg_last->uses,
REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list_and_free (insn, &reg_last->sets,
REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list_and_free (insn, &reg_last->clobbers,
REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list_and_free
(insn, &reg_last->sets,
reg_pending_barrier == TRUE_BARRIER ? 0 : REG_DEP_ANTI);
add_dependence_list_and_free
(insn, &reg_last->clobbers,
reg_pending_barrier == TRUE_BARRIER ? 0 : REG_DEP_ANTI);
reg_last->uses_length = 0;
reg_last->clobbers_length = 0;
});
......@@ -993,7 +1010,7 @@ sched_analyze_insn (deps, x, insn, loop_notes)
}
flush_pending_lists (deps, insn, true, true);
reg_pending_barrier = false;
reg_pending_barrier = NOT_A_BARRIER;
}
else
{
......@@ -1190,7 +1207,7 @@ sched_analyze (deps, head, tail)
{
/* This is setjmp. Assume that all registers, not just
hard registers, may be clobbered by this call. */
reg_pending_barrier = true;
reg_pending_barrier = MOVE_BARRIER;
}
else
{
......@@ -1505,7 +1522,7 @@ init_deps_global ()
reg_pending_sets = INITIALIZE_REG_SET (reg_pending_sets_head);
reg_pending_clobbers = INITIALIZE_REG_SET (reg_pending_clobbers_head);
reg_pending_uses = INITIALIZE_REG_SET (reg_pending_uses_head);
reg_pending_barrier = false;
reg_pending_barrier = NOT_A_BARRIER;
}
/* Free everything used by the dependency analysis code. */
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment