Commit ceae6a13 by Marek Polacek

c++: Parenthesized-init of aggregates accepts invalid code [PR94885]

Here we have (conceptually *) something like

  struct B { };
  struct D : B { };
  D(0); // invalid

and in C++20 the ()-initialization has created a { 0 } constructor that
it tries to initialize an object of type D with.  We should reject
initializing an object of type B from 0, but we wrongly accept it because
process_init_constructor_record skips initializers for empty bases/fields:
       if (DECL_SIZE (field) && integer_zerop (DECL_SIZE (field))
           && !TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (next))
         /* Don't add trivial initialization of an empty base/field to the
            constructor, as they might not be ordered the way the back-end
            expects.  */
         continue;
but here 'next' was error_mark_node, returned by massage_elt_init, so we
wound up with { } which would validly value-initialize the object.

[*] Usually digest_init in build_new_method_call_1 would detect this,
but in this case the instance is is_dummy_object and we don't call
digest just yet.

        PR c++/94885
        * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS
        if an initializer element was erroneous.

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init26.C: New test.
parent 3a296f32
2020-05-08 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Backported from mainline
2020-05-01 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/94885
* typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS
if an initializer element was erroneous.
2020-05-07 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> 2020-05-07 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Backported from mainline Backported from mainline
......
...@@ -1661,7 +1661,11 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree init, int nested, int flags, ...@@ -1661,7 +1661,11 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree init, int nested, int flags,
++idx; ++idx;
} }
} }
if (next) if (next == error_mark_node)
/* We skip initializers for empty bases/fields, so skipping an invalid
one could make us accept invalid code. */
return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS;
else if (next)
/* Already handled above. */; /* Already handled above. */;
else if (DECL_INITIAL (field)) else if (DECL_INITIAL (field))
{ {
......
// PR c++/94885 - paren-init of aggregates accepts invalid code.
// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
template <typename T, typename = decltype(T(0))> // { dg-error "could not convert" }
void foo();
struct base {};
struct derived : base {};
void
bar()
{
foo<derived>(); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment