re PR c++/60417 ([DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization)

	PR c++/60417
	* typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Set
	CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT on {} for omitted initializers.

From-SVN: r208333

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

 2014-03-04  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
 
+	PR c++/60417
+	* typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Set
+	CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT on {} for omitted initializers.
+
 	PR c++/60415
 	PR c++/54359
 	* parser.c (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Set declarator to

gcc/cp/typeck2.c

@@ -1312,6 +1312,9 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree init,
 	     for us, so build up TARGET_EXPRs.  If the type in question is
 	     a class, just build one up; if it's an array, recurse.  */
 	  next = build_constructor (init_list_type_node, NULL);
+	  /* Call this direct-initialization pending DR 1518 resolution so
+	     that explicit default ctors don't break valid C++03 code.  */
+	  CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT (next) = true;
 	  next = massage_init_elt (TREE_TYPE (field), next, complain);
 
 	  /* Warn when some struct elements are implicitly initialized.  */

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/explicit1.C

+// PR c++/60417
+
+struct A { explicit A(int = 0); };
+struct B { A a; };
+
+int main()
+{
+  B b = {};
+}