S/390: Add a new pattern for r{o,x}sbg
Fixes rXsbg_mode_sXl test failures. Combine used to give us (set (reg:SI 65) (ior:SI (lshiftrt:SI (reg:SI 3 %r3 [ bD.2238 ]) (const_int 2 [0x2])) (reg:SI 2 %r2 [ aD.2237 ]))) but now we get (set (reg:SI 65) (ior:SI (subreg:SI (zero_extract:DI (reg:DI 69) (const_int 32 [0x20]) (const_int 30 [0x1e])) 4) (subreg:SI (reg:DI 68) 4))) or (set (reg:SI 65) (ior:SI (subreg:SI (and:DI (lshiftrt:DI (reg:DI 69) (const_int 2 [0x2])) (const_int 4294967295 [0xffffffff])) 4) (subreg:SI (reg:DI 68) 4))) with an extra subreg, which appears because pseudos, unlike hard registers, can be accessed only using their natural mode. This patch adds a special case for that. Also, it performs r*sbg bit index computations during gcc run, so that expectations do not depend on which concrete pattern was matched. gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-11-16 Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> * config/s390/s390.md (*r<noxa>sbg_<mode>_srl_bitmask): Do not delegate arithmetic to assembler. (*r<noxa>sbg_<mode>_sll): Likewise. (*r<noxa>sbg_<mode>_srl): Likewise. (*r<noxa>sbg_sidi_srl): New pattern. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2018-11-16 Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> * gcc.target/s390/md/rXsbg_mode_sXl.c: Do not use arithmetic in r{o,x}sbg expectations. * gcc.target/s390/risbg-ll-2.c: Likewise. From-SVN: r266203
Showing
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment