Commit b13091dd by Tobias Burnus Committed by Tobias Burnus

PR C++/88114 Gen destructor of an abstract class

        PR C++/8811
        * decl2.c (maybe_emit_vtables): If needed, generate code for
        the destructor of an abstract class.
        (mark_used): Update comment for older function-name change.

        PR C++/88114
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted61.C: New.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted62.C: New.

From-SVN: r267855
parent 4321da7b
2019-01-11 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR C++/88114
* decl2.c (maybe_emit_vtables): If needed, generate code for
the destructor of an abstract class.
(mark_used): Update comment for older function-name change.
2019-01-11 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
* decl.c (start_decl): Improve error location.
......
......@@ -2220,6 +2220,16 @@ maybe_emit_vtables (tree ctype)
}
}
/* For abstract classes, the destructor has been removed from the
vtable (in class.c's build_vtbl_initializer). For a compiler-
generated destructor, it hence might not have been generated in
this translation unit - and with '#pragma interface' it might
never get generated. */
if (CLASSTYPE_PURE_VIRTUALS (ctype)
&& TYPE_HAS_NONTRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (ctype)
&& DECL_DEFAULTED_IN_CLASS_P(CLASSTYPE_DESTRUCTOR(ctype)))
note_vague_linkage_fn (CLASSTYPE_DESTRUCTOR(ctype));
/* Since we're writing out the vtable here, also write the debug
info. */
note_debug_info_needed (ctype);
......@@ -5497,7 +5507,7 @@ mark_used (tree decl, tsubst_flags_t complain)
within the body of a function so as to avoid collecting live data
on the stack (such as overload resolution candidates).
We could just let cp_write_global_declarations handle synthesizing
We could just let c_parse_final_cleanups handle synthesizing
this function by adding it to deferred_fns, but doing
it at the use site produces better error messages. */
++function_depth;
......
2019-01-11 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR C++/88114
* g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted61.C: New
* g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted62.C: New.
2019-01-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/88693
......
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN3OneD0Ev" } }
// PR C++/88114
// Destructor of an abstract class was never generated
// when compiling the class - nor later due to the
// '#pragma interface'
#pragma implementation
#pragma interface
class One
{
public:
virtual ~One() = default;
void some_fn();
virtual void later() = 0;
private:
int m_int;
};
void One::some_fn() { }
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "_ZN3OneD0Ev" } }
// PR C++/88114
// Destructor of an abstract class was never generated
// when compiling the class - nor later due to the
// '#pragma interface'
// -> g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted61.C
// HERE, in g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted62.C:
// As we have commented the pragmas, it should NOT be created
// #pragma implementation
// #pragma interface
class One
{
public:
virtual ~One() = default;
void some_fn();
virtual void later() = 0;
private:
int m_int;
};
void One::some_fn() { }
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment