Commit b0c6e48f by Bob Wilson Committed by Bob Wilson

xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first FP register number to 48 and…

xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first FP register number to 48 and MAC16 accumulator to 0x210.

	* config/xtensa/xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first
	FP register number to 48 and MAC16 accumulator to 0x210.

From-SVN: r72283
parent 64833be0
2003-10-09 Bob Wilson <bob.wilson@acm.org>
* config/xtensa/xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first
FP register number to 48 and MAC16 accumulator to 0x210.
2003-10-09 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
* config.gcc: Remove redundant thread_file setting clauses for
......
......@@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ xtensa_emit_call (int callop, rtx *operands)
}
/* Return the stabs register number to use for 'regno'. */
/* Return the debugger register number to use for 'regno'. */
int
xtensa_dbx_register_number (int regno)
......@@ -1666,17 +1666,12 @@ xtensa_dbx_register_number (int regno)
else if (FP_REG_P (regno))
{
regno -= FP_REG_FIRST;
/* The current numbering convention is that TIE registers are
numbered in libcc order beginning with 256. We can't guarantee
that the FP registers will come first, so the following is just
a guess. It seems like we should make a special case for FP
registers and give them fixed numbers < 256. */
first = 256;
first = 48;
}
else if (ACC_REG_P (regno))
{
first = 0;
regno = -1;
first = 0x200; /* Start of Xtensa special registers. */
regno = 16; /* ACCLO is special register 16. */
}
/* When optimizing, we sometimes get asked about pseudo-registers
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment