Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
b0af456a
Commit
b0af456a
authored
Jul 11, 2012
by
Jonathan Wakely
Committed by
Jonathan Wakely
Jul 11, 2012
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
* doc/extend.texi (Namespace Association): Alter cautionary text.
From-SVN: r189422
parent
2ece515a
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
7 additions
and
4 deletions
+7
-4
gcc/ChangeLog
+4
-0
gcc/doc/extend.texi
+3
-4
No files found.
gcc/ChangeLog
View file @
b0af456a
2012-07-11 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
* doc/extend.texi (Namespace Association): Alter cautionary text.
2012-07-10 Oleg Endo <olegendo@gcc.gnu.org>
2012-07-10 Oleg Endo <olegendo@gcc.gnu.org>
PR target/53911
PR target/53911
...
...
gcc/doc/extend.texi
View file @
b0af456a
...
@@ -15527,10 +15527,9 @@ See also @ref{Namespace Association}.
...
@@ -15527,10 +15527,9 @@ See also @ref{Namespace Association}.
@node Namespace Association
@node Namespace Association
@section Namespace Association
@section Namespace Association
@strong{Caution:} The semantics of this extension are not fully
@strong{Caution:} The semantics of this extension are equivalent
defined. Users should refrain from using this extension as its
to C++ 2011 inline namespaces. Users should use inline namespaces
semantics may change subtly over time. It is possible that this
instead as this extension will be removed in future versions of G++.
extension will be removed in future versions of G++.
A using-directive with @code{__attribute ((strong))} is stronger
A using-directive with @code{__attribute ((strong))} is stronger
than a normal using-directive in two ways:
than a normal using-directive in two ways:
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment