re PR java/10145 (java and c++ disagree about class layout)

        PR java/10145
        * stor-layout.c (update_alignment_for_field): Respect
        DECL_USER_ALIGN for zero-length bitfields, too.
        * c-decl.c (finish_struct): Don't set DECL_ALIGN for normal
        fields.
        * cp/class.c (check_field_decl): Don't set DECL_ALIGN.

From-SVN: r65103

gcc/ChangeLog

+2003-03-31  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
+
+	PR java/10145
+	* stor-layout.c (update_alignment_for_field): Respect
+	DECL_USER_ALIGN for zero-length bitfields, too.
+	* c-decl.c (finish_struct): Don't set DECL_ALIGN for normal
+	fields.
+
 2003-03-31  Matt Austern  <austern@apple.com>
 
 	* cpppch.c (struct cpp_savedstate): Add defs and n_defs members.

gcc/c-decl.c

@@ -5257,18 +5257,6 @@ finish_struct (t, fieldlist, attributes)
 	    }
 	}
 
-      else if (TREE_TYPE (x) != error_mark_node)
-	{
-	  unsigned int min_align = (DECL_PACKED (x) ? BITS_PER_UNIT
-				    : TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (x)));
-
-	  /* Non-bit-fields are aligned for their type, except packed
-	     fields which require only BITS_PER_UNIT alignment.  */
-	  DECL_ALIGN (x) = MAX (DECL_ALIGN (x), min_align);
-	  if (! DECL_PACKED (x))
-	    DECL_USER_ALIGN (x) |= TYPE_USER_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (x));
-	}
-
       DECL_INITIAL (x) = 0;
 
       /* Detect flexible array member in an invalid context.  */

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

+2003-03-31  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
+
+	PR java/10145
+	* class.c (check_field_decl): Don't set DECL_ALIGN.
+
 2003-03-30  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 	PR c++/7647

gcc/cp/class.c

@@ -3057,15 +3057,6 @@ check_field_decl (tree field,
 	cp_error_at ("multiple fields in union `%T' initialized");
       *any_default_members = 1;
     }
-
-  /* Non-bit-fields are aligned for their type, except packed fields
-     which require only BITS_PER_UNIT alignment.  */
-  DECL_ALIGN (field) = MAX (DECL_ALIGN (field), 
-			    (DECL_PACKED (field) 
-			     ? BITS_PER_UNIT
-			     : TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (field))));
-  if (! DECL_PACKED (field))
-    DECL_USER_ALIGN (field) |= TYPE_USER_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (field));
 }
 
 /* Check the data members (both static and non-static), class-scoped

gcc/stor-layout.c

@@ -746,7 +746,8 @@ update_alignment_for_field (rli, field, known_align)
     {
       /* A zero-length bit-field affects the alignment of the next
 	 field.  */
-      if (!DECL_PACKED (field) && integer_zerop (DECL_SIZE (field)))
+      if (!DECL_PACKED (field) && !user_align
+	  && integer_zerop (DECL_SIZE (field)))
 	{
 	  desired_align = TYPE_ALIGN (type);
 #ifdef ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/align-1.c

+// PR java/10145
+// Test that requesting an alignment of 1 does not increase the alignment
+// of a long long field.
+
+// { dg-do run }
+
+struct A
+{
+  char c;
+  long long i;
+};
+
+struct B
+{
+  char c;
+  long long i __attribute ((__aligned__ (1)));
+};
+
+int main ()
+{
+  if (sizeof (struct A) != sizeof (struct B))
+    abort ();
+  return 0;
+}