Commit aab648a9 by Segher Boessenkool Committed by Segher Boessenkool

dce: Don't dead-code delete separately wrapped restores

If there is a separately wrapped register restore on some path that
is dead (say, control goes into an endless loop after it), then we
cannot delete that restore because that would confuse the DWARF CFI
(if there is another path joining).
This happens with gcc.dg/torture/pr53168.c, for example.


	* dce.c (delete_unmarked_insns): Don't delete instructions with
	a REG_CFA_RESTORE note.

From-SVN: r241060
parent 20a6ece0
2016-10-12 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
* dce.c (delete_unmarked_insns): Don't delete instructions with
a REG_CFA_RESTORE note.
2016-10-12 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
* common.opt (-fshrink-wrap-separate): New flag.
* doc/invoke.texi: Document it.
* doc/tm.texi.in (Shrink-wrapping separate components): New subsection.
......
......@@ -587,6 +587,15 @@ delete_unmarked_insns (void)
if (!dbg_cnt (dce))
continue;
if (crtl->shrink_wrapped_separate
&& find_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_RESTORE, NULL))
{
if (dump_file)
fprintf (dump_file, "DCE: NOT deleting insn %d, it's a "
"callee-save restore\n", INSN_UID (insn));
continue;
}
if (dump_file)
fprintf (dump_file, "DCE: Deleting insn %d\n", INSN_UID (insn));
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment