Commit a28edad3 by Patrick Palka

c++: Non-type-dependent variadic lambda init-capture [PR94483]

In this PR, we're ICEing on a use of an 'int... a' template parameter pack as
part of the variadic lambda init-capture [...z=a].

The unexpected thing about this variadic init-capture is that it is not
type-dependent, and so the call to do_auto_deduction from
lambda_capture_field_type actually resolves its type to 'int' instead of exiting
early like it does for a type-dependent variadic initializer.  This later
confuses add_capture which, according to one of its comments, assumes that
'type' is always 'auto' for a variadic init-capture.

The simplest fix (and the approach that this patch takes) seems to be to avoid
doing auto deduction in lambda_capture_field_type when the initializer uses
parameter packs, so that we always return 'auto' even in the non-type-dependent
case.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/94483
	* lambda.c (lambda_capture_field_type): Avoid doing auto deduction if
	the explicit initializer has parameter packs.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/94483
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-pack-init5.C: New test.
parent 3f5af3f7
2020-04-17 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
PR c++/94483
* lambda.c (lambda_capture_field_type): Avoid doing auto deduction if
the explicit initializer has parameter packs.
PR c++/88754
* parser.c (cp_parser_check_template_parameters): Before issuing a hard
error, first try simulating an error instead.
......
......@@ -223,7 +223,10 @@ lambda_capture_field_type (tree expr, bool explicit_init_p,
/* Add the reference now, so deduction doesn't lose
outermost CV qualifiers of EXPR. */
type = build_reference_type (type);
type = do_auto_deduction (type, expr, auto_node);
if (uses_parameter_packs (expr))
/* Stick with 'auto' even if the type could be deduced. */;
else
type = do_auto_deduction (type, expr, auto_node);
}
else if (!is_this && type_dependent_expression_p (expr))
{
......
2020-04-17 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
PR c++/94483
* g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-pack-init5.C: New test.
PR c++/88754
* g++.dg/parse/ambig10.C: New test.
......
// PR c++/94483
// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
template<int... a> constexpr auto x1
= [...z = -a] (auto F) { return F(z...); };
template<const int&... a> constexpr auto x2
= [&...z = a] (auto F) { return F(z...); };
template<int... a> constexpr auto x3
= [z = -a] (auto F) { return F(z); }; // { dg-error "packs not expanded" }
constexpr auto sum = [] (auto... xs) { return (xs + ... + 0); };
const int y1 = 1, y2 = 2, y3 = 3;
static_assert(x1<1,2,3>(sum) == -6);
static_assert(x2<y1,y2,y3>(sum) == 6);
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment