re PR c++/9602 (Total confusion about template/friend/virtual/abstract)

	PR c++/9602
	* typeck2.c (abstract_virtuals_error): Don't check when
	TYPE is still template parameter dependent.

	* g++.dg/template/friend16.C: New test.

From-SVN: r63362

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

+2003-02-24  Kriang Lerdsuwanakij  <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
+
+	PR c++/9602
+	* typeck2.c (abstract_virtuals_error): Don't check when
+	TYPE is still template parameter dependent.
+
 2003-02-23  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 	PR c++/5333

gcc/cp/typeck2.c

@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ abstract_virtuals_error (decl, type)
        CLASSTYPE_PURE_VIRTUALS holds the inline friends.  */
     return 0;
 
+  if (dependent_type_p (type))
+    /* For a dependent type, we do not yet know which functions are pure
+       virtuals.  */
+    return 0;
+
   u = CLASSTYPE_PURE_VIRTUALS (type);
   if (decl)
     {

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2003-02-24  Kriang Lerdsuwanakij  <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
+
+	PR c++/9602
+	* g++.dg/template/friend16.C: New test.
+
 2003-02-23  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 	PR c++/5333

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/friend16.C

+// { dg-do compile }
+
+// Origin: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
+
+// PR c++/9602: Inline friend/pure virtual tree data sharing in
+// class template.
+
+template <typename T> struct X {
+  void foo (X);
+  friend void bar () {}
+};
+    
+template <typename T>
+void X<T>::foo (X x) {}
+    
+template struct X<int>;