Skip to content

R
riscv-gcc-1
Commit 9923a30d by Jim Wilson
Options

(back_branch_in_range_p): No longer static. 

From-SVN: r9677
parent 09dcbd74
Showing with 1 additions and 2 deletions
gcc/unroll.c
...@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ static rtx initial_reg_note_copy PROTO((rtx, struct inline_remap *)); ...@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ static rtx initial_reg_note_copy PROTO((rtx, struct inline_remap *));
static void final_reg_note_copy PROTO((rtx, struct inline_remap *)); static void final_reg_note_copy PROTO((rtx, struct inline_remap *));
static void copy_loop_body PROTO((rtx, rtx, struct inline_remap *, rtx, int, static void copy_loop_body PROTO((rtx, rtx, struct inline_remap *, rtx, int,
enum unroll_types, rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx)); enum unroll_types, rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx));
static int back_branch_in_range_p PROTO((rtx, rtx, rtx));
static void iteration_info PROTO((rtx, rtx *, rtx *, rtx, rtx)); static void iteration_info PROTO((rtx, rtx *, rtx *, rtx, rtx));
static rtx approx_final_value PROTO((enum rtx_code, rtx, int *, int *)); static rtx approx_final_value PROTO((enum rtx_code, rtx, int *, int *));
static int find_splittable_regs PROTO((enum unroll_types, rtx, rtx, rtx, int)); static int find_splittable_regs PROTO((enum unroll_types, rtx, rtx, rtx, int));
...@@ -2021,7 +2020,7 @@ emit_unrolled_add (dest_reg, src_reg, increment) ...@@ -2021,7 +2020,7 @@ emit_unrolled_add (dest_reg, src_reg, increment)
In practice, this is not a problem, because this function is seldom called, In practice, this is not a problem, because this function is seldom called,
and uses a negligible amount of CPU time on average. */ and uses a negligible amount of CPU time on average. */
static int int
back_branch_in_range_p (insn, loop_start, loop_end) back_branch_in_range_p (insn, loop_start, loop_end)
rtx insn; rtx insn;
rtx loop_start, loop_end; rtx loop_start, loop_end;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment