reload1.c (eliminate_regs, case MINUS): Canonicalize (minus (plus reg const)…

reload1.c (eliminate_regs, case MINUS): Canonicalize (minus (plus reg const) reg) to (plus (minus reg reg) const).

	* reload1.c (eliminate_regs, case MINUS): Canonicalize
	(minus (plus reg const) reg) to (plus (minus reg reg) const).
Back out this patch.

From-SVN: r13664

gcc/reload1.c

@@ -2873,7 +2873,7 @@ eliminate_regs (x, mem_mode, insn)
 	 context.
 
 	 If we have (plus (eliminable) (reg)), we want to produce
-	 (plus (plus (replacement) (reg)) (const)).  If this was part of a
+	 (plus (plus (replacement) (reg) (const))).  If this was part of a
 	 normal add insn, (plus (replacement) (reg)) will be pushed as a
 	 reload.  This is the desired action.  */
 
@@ -2912,28 +2912,6 @@ eliminate_regs (x, mem_mode, insn)
       }
       return x;
 
-    case MINUS:
-      /* If we have (minus (eliminable) (reg)), we want to produce
-	 (plus (minus (replacement) (reg)) (const)).  The main reason being
-	 to be consistent with what is done for PLUS.  find_reloads_address
-	 assumes that we do this.  */
-      {
-	rtx new0 = eliminate_regs (XEXP (x, 0), mem_mode, insn);
-	rtx new1 = eliminate_regs (XEXP (x, 1), mem_mode, insn);
-
-	if (new0 != XEXP (x, 0) || new1 != XEXP (x, 1))
-	  {
-	    if (GET_CODE (new0) == PLUS)
-	      return gen_rtx (PLUS, GET_MODE (x),
-			      gen_rtx (MINUS, GET_MODE (x),
-				       XEXP (new0, 0), new1),
-			      XEXP (new0, 1));
-	    else
-	      return gen_rtx (MINUS, GET_MODE (x), new0, new1);
-	  }
-      }
-      return x;
-
     case MULT:
       /* If this is the product of an eliminable register and a 
 	 constant, apply the distribute law and move the constant out
@@ -2962,6 +2940,7 @@ eliminate_regs (x, mem_mode, insn)
 
     case CALL:
     case COMPARE:
+    case MINUS:
     case DIV:      case UDIV:
     case MOD:      case UMOD:
     case AND:      case IOR:      case XOR: