re PR c++/5645 (gcc warns that pure virtual class not explicitly initialized)

        PR c++/5645
        PR c++/11159
        * class.c (type_has_user_nondefault_constructor): New fn.
        * cp-tree.h: Declare it.
        * init.c (emit_mem_initializers): Use it for -W warning about
        missing base initializer.

Co-Authored-By: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>

From-SVN: r132324

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

+2008-02-14  Manuel Lopez-Ibanez  <manu@gcc.gnu.org>
+	    Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
+
+	PR c++/5645
+	PR c++/11159
+	* class.c (type_has_user_nondefault_constructor): New fn.
+	* cp-tree.h: Declare it.
+	* init.c (emit_mem_initializers): Use it for -W warning about
+	missing base initializer.
+
 2008-02-14  Paolo Carlini  <pcarlini@suse.de>
 
         PR c++/28743

gcc/cp/class.c

@@ -4039,6 +4039,28 @@ clone_constructors_and_destructors (tree t)
     clone_function_decl (OVL_CURRENT (fns), /*update_method_vec_p=*/1);
 }
 
+/* Returns true iff class T has a user-defined constructor other than
+   the default constructor.  */
+
+bool
+type_has_user_nondefault_constructor (tree t)
+{
+  tree fns;
+
+  if (!TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR (t))
+    return false;
+
+  for (fns = CLASSTYPE_CONSTRUCTORS (t); fns; fns = OVL_NEXT (fns))
+    {
+      tree fn = OVL_CURRENT (fns);
+      if (!DECL_ARTIFICIAL (fn)
+	  && skip_artificial_parms_for (fn, DECL_ARGUMENTS (fn)) != NULL_TREE)
+	return true;
+    }
+
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Remove all zero-width bit-fields from T.  */
 
 static void

gcc/cp/cp-tree.h

@@ -4157,6 +4157,7 @@ extern void determine_key_method		(tree);
 extern void check_for_override			(tree, tree);
 extern void push_class_stack			(void);
 extern void pop_class_stack			(void);
+extern bool type_has_user_nondefault_constructor (tree);
 
 /* in cvt.c */
 extern tree convert_to_reference		(tree, tree, int, int, tree);

gcc/cp/init.c

@@ -829,12 +829,13 @@ emit_mem_initializers (tree mem_inits)
       tree subobject = TREE_PURPOSE (mem_inits);
       tree arguments = TREE_VALUE (mem_inits);
 
-      /* If these initializations are taking place in a copy
-	 constructor, the base class should probably be explicitly
-	 initialized.  */
+      /* If these initializations are taking place in a copy constructor,
+	 the base class should probably be explicitly initialized if there
+	 is a user-defined constructor in the base class (other than the
+	 default constructor, which will be called anyway).  */
       if (extra_warnings && !arguments
 	  && DECL_COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_P (current_function_decl)
-	  && TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING (BINFO_TYPE (subobject)))
+	  && type_has_user_nondefault_constructor (BINFO_TYPE (subobject)))
 	warning (OPT_Wextra, "%Jbase class %q#T should be explicitly initialized in the "
 		 "copy constructor",
 		 current_function_decl, BINFO_TYPE (subobject));

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wreorder-1.C

@@ -10,5 +10,5 @@ struct T {
 
 struct U : virtual public S, virtual public T {
   U () : T (), S () {}     // { dg-warning "" }
-  U (const U&) : S () {}   // { dg-warning "copy" }
+  U (const U&) : S () {}
 };

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/pr11159.C

+// PR c++/11159 : erroneous warning in copy ctor with virtual inheritance
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-Wall -Wextra" }
+struct A
+{
+  A ();
+};
+
+struct B : virtual A
+{
+  B ();
+};
+
+struct C : virtual A
+{
+  C ();
+};
+
+struct D : B, C
+{
+  D (D const&){}
+};
+
+template <typename Base>
+struct E : Base
+{
+  E ();
+
+  E (E const &)
+    : Base ()
+  {
+  };
+};
+
+E<C> foo;
+E<C> bar (foo);
+

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/pr5645.C

+// PR5645: gcc warns that pure virtual class not explicitly initialized.  
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-Wall -Wextra" }
+
+class a {
+public:
+  virtual int f() = 0;
+  virtual int g() = 0;
+};
+
+class b : public a {
+public:
+  b();
+  b(const b& c);
+
+protected:
+  int i;
+};
+
+b::b() {}
+
+b::b(const b& c) { // { dg-bogus "base class .class a. should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor" }
+  i = c.i;
+}
+
+struct X {};
+
+struct Y : X
+{
+  Y (Y const&) {}
+};
+