Skip to content

R
riscv-gcc-1
Commit 8b04083b by Vladimir Makarov Committed by Vladimir Makarov
Options

function.c (purge_addressof_replacements): Rename into purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements. 

Wed May  5 16:26:13 1999  Vladimir Makarov  <vmakarov@tofu.to.cygnus.com>
	* function.c (purge_addressof_replacements): Rename into
 	purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements.
	(purge_addressof_replacements): New variable.
	(purge_addressof_1): Add code for changing addressof in notes for
 	field values which are extracted by usage MEM with narrower mode.
	(purge_addressof): Initialize purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements.

From-SVN: r26784
parent 24dc3000
Showing with 85 additions and 49 deletions
gcc/ChangeLog
Wed May 5 16:26:13 1999 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@tofu.to.cygnus.com>
* function.c (purge_addressof_replacements): Rename into
purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements.
(purge_addressof_replacements): New variable.
(purge_addressof_1): Add code for changing addressof in notes for
field values which are extracted by usage MEM with narrower mode.
(purge_addressof): Initialize purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements.
Wed May 5 07:40:02 1999 Nick Clifton <nickc@cygnus.com>
Patch from: Nick Burrett <nick.burrett@btinternet.com>
......
gcc/function.c
......@@ -3031,6 +3031,14 @@ put_addressof_into_stack (r, ht)
/* List of replacements made below in purge_addressof_1 when creating
bitfield insertions. */
static rtx purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements;
/* List of replacements made below in purge_addressof_1 for patterns
(MEM (ADDRESSOF (REG ...))). The key of the list entry is the
corresponding (ADDRESSOF (REG ...)) and value is a substitution for
the all pattern. List PURGE_BITFIELD_ADDRESSOF_REPLACEMENTS is not
enough in complex cases, e.g. when some field values can be
extracted by usage MEM with narrower mode. */
static rtx purge_addressof_replacements;
/* Helper function for purge_addressof. See if the rtx expression at *LOC
......@@ -3110,51 +3118,54 @@ purge_addressof_1 (loc, insn, force, store, ht)
was replaced by. */
rtx tem;
for (tem = purge_addressof_replacements; tem != NULL_RTX;
for (tem = purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements;
tem != NULL_RTX;
tem = XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 1))
{
rtx y = XEXP (tem, 0);
if (GET_CODE (y) == MEM
&& rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), XEXP (y, 0)))
{
/* It can happen that the note may speak of things in
a wider (or just different) mode than the code did.
This is especially true of REG_RETVAL. */
if (rtx_equal_p (x, XEXP (tem, 0)))
{
*loc = XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 0);
return;
}
rtx z = XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 0);
if (GET_MODE (x) != GET_MODE (y))
{
if (GET_CODE (z) == SUBREG && SUBREG_WORD (z) == 0)
z = SUBREG_REG (z);
/* ??? If we'd gotten into any of the really complex
cases below, I'm not sure we can do a proper
replacement. Might we be able to delete the
note in some cases? */
if (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x))
< GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (y)))
abort ();
if (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x)) > UNITS_PER_WORD
&& (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x))
> GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (z))))
{
/* This can occur as a result in invalid
pointer casts, e.g. float f; ...
*(long long int *)&f.
??? We could emit a warning here, but
without a line number that wouldn't be
very helpful. */
z = gen_rtx_SUBREG (GET_MODE (x), z, 0);
}
else
z = gen_lowpart (GET_MODE (x), z);
}
/* See comment for purge_addressof_replacements. */
for (tem = purge_addressof_replacements;
tem != NULL_RTX;
tem = XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 1))
if (rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), XEXP (tem, 0)))
{
rtx z = XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 0);
*loc = z;
return;
}
}
if (GET_MODE (x) == GET_MODE (z)
|| (GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 0)) != REG
&& GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 0)) != SUBREG))
abort ();
/* It can happen that the note may speak of things
in a wider (or just different) mode than the
code did. This is especially true of
REG_RETVAL. */
if (GET_CODE (z) == SUBREG && SUBREG_WORD (z) == 0)
z = SUBREG_REG (z);
if (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x)) > UNITS_PER_WORD
&& (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x))
> GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (z))))
{
/* This can occur as a result in invalid
pointer casts, e.g. float f; ...
*(long long int *)&f.
??? We could emit a warning here, but
without a line number that wouldn't be
very helpful. */
z = gen_rtx_SUBREG (GET_MODE (x), z, 0);
}
else
z = gen_lowpart (GET_MODE (x), z);
*loc = z;
return;
}
/* There should always be such a replacement. */
abort ();
......@@ -3242,10 +3253,11 @@ purge_addressof_1 (loc, insn, force, store, ht)
/* Remember the replacement so that the same one can be done
on the REG_NOTES. */
purge_addressof_replacements
purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements
= gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, x,
gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, val,
purge_addressof_replacements));
gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST
(VOIDmode, val,
purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements));
/* We replaced with a reg -- all done. */
return;
......@@ -3255,10 +3267,24 @@ purge_addressof_1 (loc, insn, force, store, ht)
{
/* Remember the replacement so that the same one can be done
on the REG_NOTES. */
purge_addressof_replacements
= gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, x,
gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, sub,
purge_addressof_replacements));
if (GET_CODE (sub) == REG || GET_CODE (sub) == SUBREG)
{
rtx tem;
for (tem = purge_addressof_replacements;
tem != NULL_RTX;
tem = XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 1))
if (rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), XEXP (tem, 0)))
{
XEXP (XEXP (tem, 1), 0) = sub;
return;
}
purge_addressof_replacements
= gen_rtx (EXPR_LIST, VOIDmode, XEXP (x, 0),
gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, sub,
purge_addressof_replacements));
return;
}
goto restart;
}
give_up:;
......@@ -3440,6 +3466,7 @@ purge_addressof (insns)
/* Clean up. */
hash_table_free (&ht);
purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements = 0;
purge_addressof_replacements = 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment