Commit 874d29e5 by Jason Merrill Committed by Jason Merrill

method.c (maybe_explain_implicit_delete): Use pointer_set instead of htab.

	* method.c (maybe_explain_implicit_delete): Use pointer_set
	instead of htab.

From-SVN: r175645
parent b198484e
2011-06-29 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* method.c (maybe_explain_implicit_delete): Use pointer_set
instead of htab.
* class.c (finalize_literal_type_property): Update conditions.
* method.c (defaulted_late_check): Set TYPE_HAS_CONSTEXPR_CTOR.
......
......@@ -1320,21 +1320,17 @@ maybe_explain_implicit_delete (tree decl)
if (DECL_DEFAULTED_FN (decl))
{
/* Not marked GTY; it doesn't need to be GC'd or written to PCH. */
static htab_t explained_htab;
void **slot;
static struct pointer_set_t *explained;
special_function_kind sfk;
location_t loc;
bool informed;
tree ctype;
if (!explained_htab)
explained_htab = htab_create (37, htab_hash_pointer,
htab_eq_pointer, NULL);
slot = htab_find_slot (explained_htab, decl, INSERT);
if (*slot)
if (!explained)
explained = pointer_set_create ();
if (pointer_set_insert (explained, decl))
return true;
*slot = decl;
sfk = special_function_p (decl);
ctype = DECL_CONTEXT (decl);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment