re PR c++/47721 ([C++0x] Updated friendship rules?)

	PR c++/47721
	* parser.c (cp_parser_member_declaration): Allow friend T.
	* friend.c (make_friend_class): Ignore non-classes.
	* pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1): Handle TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM.

From-SVN: r174319

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

 2011-05-26  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
 
+	PR c++/47721
+	* parser.c (cp_parser_member_declaration): Allow friend T.
+	* friend.c (make_friend_class): Ignore non-classes.
+	* pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1): Handle TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM.
+
 	DR 1004
 	* pt.c (convert_template_argument): Don't complain about using
 	injected-class-name as template template argument.

gcc/cp/friend.c

@@ -226,7 +226,14 @@ make_friend_class (tree type, tree friend_type, bool complain)
 
   if (! MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P (friend_type))
     {
-      error ("invalid type %qT declared %<friend%>", friend_type);
+      /* N1791: If the type specifier in a friend declaration designates a
+	 (possibly cv-qualified) class type, that class is declared as a
+	 friend; otherwise, the friend declaration is ignored.
+
+         So don't complain in C++0x mode.  */
+      if (cxx_dialect < cxx0x)
+	pedwarn (input_location, complain ? 0 : OPT_pedantic,
+		 "invalid type %qT declared %<friend%>", friend_type);
       return;
     }
 

gcc/cp/parser.c

@@ -17758,9 +17758,10 @@ cp_parser_member_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
 	    {
 	      /* If the `friend' keyword was present, the friend must
 		 be introduced with a class-key.  */
-	       if (!declares_class_or_enum)
-		 error_at (decl_spec_token_start->location,
-			   "a class-key must be used when declaring a friend");
+	       if (!declares_class_or_enum && cxx_dialect < cxx0x)
+		 pedwarn (decl_spec_token_start->location, OPT_pedantic,
+			  "in C++03 a class-key must be used "
+			  "when declaring a friend");
 	       /* In this case:
 
 		    template <typename T> struct A {
@@ -17769,10 +17770,12 @@ cp_parser_member_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
 
 		  A<T>::B will be represented by a TYPENAME_TYPE, and
 		  therefore not recognized by check_tag_decl.  */
-	       if (!type
-		   && decl_specifiers.type
-		   && TYPE_P (decl_specifiers.type))
-		 type = decl_specifiers.type;
+	       if (!type)
+		 {
+		   type = decl_specifiers.type;
+		   if (type && TREE_CODE (type) == TYPE_DECL)
+		     type = TREE_TYPE (type);
+		 }
 	       if (!type || !TYPE_P (type))
 		 error_at (decl_spec_token_start->location,
 			   "friend declaration does not name a class or "

gcc/cp/pt.c

@@ -8472,7 +8472,8 @@ instantiate_class_template_1 (tree type)
 		    friend_type = TREE_TYPE (friend_type);
 		  adjust_processing_template_decl = true;
 		}
-	      else if (TREE_CODE (friend_type) == TYPENAME_TYPE)
+	      else if (TREE_CODE (friend_type) == TYPENAME_TYPE
+		       || TREE_CODE (friend_type) == TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM)
 		{
 		  /* This could be either
 

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

 2011-05-26  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
 
+	* g++.dg/cpp0x/friend1.C: New.
+	* g++.dg/cpp0x/friend2.C: New.
+
 	* g++.dg/cpp0x/auto7.C: Update.
 	* g++.dg/template/crash50.C: Adjust.
 	* g++.dg/template/static9.C: Adjust.

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/friend1.C

+// From N1791
+// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
+
+class C;
+typedef C Ct;
+class X1 {
+  friend C;		// OK: class C is a friend
+};
+
+class X2
+{
+  friend Ct;		// OK: class C is a friend
+  friend D;		// { dg-error "" } no type-name D in scope
+  friend class D;	// OK: elaborated-type-specifier declares new class
+};
+
+template <typename T> class R {
+  friend T;
+};
+
+R<C> rc;		// class C is a friend of R<C>
+R<int> Ri;		// OK: "friend int;" is ignored

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/friend2.C

+// PR c++/47721
+// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
+
+// template type parameter friend:
+
+template<class W>
+class Q
+{
+  static const int I = 2;
+public:
+  friend W;
+};
+
+struct B
+{
+  int ar[Q<B>::I];
+};
+
+// bonus template template parameter friend:
+
+template <class T> struct A;
+
+template<template <class> class W>
+class P
+{
+  static const int I = 2;
+public:
+  // I'm not sure this is well-formed, but I can't find anything
+  // that says otherwise.
+  template <class T> friend class W;
+};
+
+template <class T>
+struct A
+{
+  int ar[P<A>::I];
+};
+
+A<int> a;
+