Commit 85ebc193 by Richard Biener Committed by Richard Biener

re PR c++/65851 (ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535)

2015-04-28  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	PR tree-optimization/65851
	* tree-ssa-ccp.c (set_lattice_value): Perform a meet when
	changing CONSTANT to CONSTANT non-copy.  Get new_val by reference.
	(ccp_lattice_meet): Remove stray argument.  Use operand_equal_p
	rather than simple_cst_equal as the latter doesn't handle COMPLEX_CST.
	(ccp_visit_phi_node): Adjust.
	(evaluate_stmt): For simplifications to SSA names return its
	lattice value if that isn't VARYING.  Return immediately when
	simplified to a constant.
	(visit_assignment): Adjust.
	(ccp_visit_stmt): Likewise.

	* g++.dg/torture/pr65851.C: New testcase.

From-SVN: r222510
parent a66dfffd
2015-04-28 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/65851
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (set_lattice_value): Perform a meet when
changing CONSTANT to CONSTANT non-copy. Get new_val by reference.
(ccp_lattice_meet): Remove stray argument. Use operand_equal_p
rather than simple_cst_equal as the latter doesn't handle COMPLEX_CST.
(ccp_visit_phi_node): Adjust.
(evaluate_stmt): For simplifications to SSA names return its
lattice value if that isn't VARYING. Return immediately when
simplified to a constant.
(visit_assignment): Adjust.
(ccp_visit_stmt): Likewise.
2015-04-28 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR tree-optimization/65818
......
2015-04-28 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/65851
* g++.dg/torture/pr65851.C: New testcase.
2015-04-27 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/65217
......
// { dg-do compile }
class A {
virtual unsigned long write(const char *, unsigned long);
};
char *a;
int b;
bool c;
char e[16];
class B {
public:
void push_range(const char *);
};
class C : A {
B m_string;
public:
unsigned long write(const char *p1, unsigned long p2) {
m_string.push_range(p1 + p2);
}
};
char *write_signed_decimal_backward(bool) {
char *d = 0;
if (b) {
if (c)
--a;
d = a;
}
return d;
}
template <typename TextOutputStreamType>
void ostream_write(TextOutputStreamType &p1) {
char *f = write_signed_decimal_backward(false);
p1.write(f, e - f);
}
void operator<<(C p1, int) { ostream_write(p1); }
......@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static unsigned n_const_val;
static void canonicalize_value (ccp_prop_value_t *);
static bool ccp_fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *);
static void ccp_lattice_meet (ccp_prop_value_t *, ccp_prop_value_t *);
/* Dump constant propagation value VAL to file OUTF prefixed by PREFIX. */
......@@ -512,54 +513,51 @@ valid_lattice_transition (ccp_prop_value_t old_val, ccp_prop_value_t new_val)
value is different from VAR's previous value. */
static bool
set_lattice_value (tree var, ccp_prop_value_t new_val)
set_lattice_value (tree var, ccp_prop_value_t *new_val)
{
/* We can deal with old UNINITIALIZED values just fine here. */
ccp_prop_value_t *old_val = &const_val[SSA_NAME_VERSION (var)];
canonicalize_value (&new_val);
canonicalize_value (new_val);
/* We have to be careful to not go up the bitwise lattice
represented by the mask.
??? This doesn't seem to be the best place to enforce this. */
if (new_val.lattice_val == CONSTANT
represented by the mask. Instead of dropping to VARYING
use the meet operator to retain a conservative value.
Missed optimizations like PR65851 makes this necessary.
It also ensures we converge to a stable lattice solution. */
if (new_val->lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& old_val->lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& TREE_CODE (new_val.value) == INTEGER_CST
&& TREE_CODE (old_val->value) == INTEGER_CST)
{
widest_int diff = (wi::to_widest (new_val.value)
^ wi::to_widest (old_val->value));
new_val.mask = new_val.mask | old_val->mask | diff;
}
&& TREE_CODE (new_val->value) != SSA_NAME)
ccp_lattice_meet (new_val, old_val);
gcc_checking_assert (valid_lattice_transition (*old_val, new_val));
gcc_checking_assert (valid_lattice_transition (*old_val, *new_val));
/* If *OLD_VAL and NEW_VAL are the same, return false to inform the
caller that this was a non-transition. */
if (old_val->lattice_val != new_val.lattice_val
|| (new_val.lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& (TREE_CODE (new_val.value) != TREE_CODE (old_val->value)
|| (TREE_CODE (new_val.value) == INTEGER_CST
&& (new_val.mask != old_val->mask
if (old_val->lattice_val != new_val->lattice_val
|| (new_val->lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& (TREE_CODE (new_val->value) != TREE_CODE (old_val->value)
|| (TREE_CODE (new_val->value) == INTEGER_CST
&& (new_val->mask != old_val->mask
|| (wi::bit_and_not (wi::to_widest (old_val->value),
new_val.mask)
!= wi::bit_and_not (wi::to_widest (new_val.value),
new_val.mask))))
|| (TREE_CODE (new_val.value) != INTEGER_CST
&& !operand_equal_p (new_val.value, old_val->value, 0)))))
new_val->mask)
!= wi::bit_and_not (wi::to_widest (new_val->value),
new_val->mask))))
|| (TREE_CODE (new_val->value) != INTEGER_CST
&& !operand_equal_p (new_val->value, old_val->value, 0)))))
{
/* ??? We would like to delay creation of INTEGER_CSTs from
partially constants here. */
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
{
dump_lattice_value (dump_file, "Lattice value changed to ", new_val);
dump_lattice_value (dump_file, "Lattice value changed to ", *new_val);
fprintf (dump_file, ". Adding SSA edges to worklist.\n");
}
*old_val = new_val;
*old_val = *new_val;
gcc_assert (new_val.lattice_val != UNINITIALIZED);
gcc_assert (new_val->lattice_val != UNINITIALIZED);
return true;
}
......@@ -991,8 +989,7 @@ ccp_finalize (void)
*/
static void
ccp_lattice_meet (basic_block where,
ccp_prop_value_t *val1, ccp_prop_value_t *val2)
ccp_lattice_meet (ccp_prop_value_t *val1, ccp_prop_value_t *val2)
{
if (val1->lattice_val == UNDEFINED
/* For UNDEFINED M SSA we can't always SSA because its definition
......@@ -1042,7 +1039,7 @@ ccp_lattice_meet (basic_block where,
}
else if (val1->lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& val2->lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& simple_cst_equal (val1->value, val2->value) == 1)
&& operand_equal_p (val1->value, val2->value, 0))
{
/* Ci M Cj = Ci if (i == j)
Ci M Cj = VARYING if (i != j)
......@@ -1061,7 +1058,7 @@ ccp_lattice_meet (basic_block where,
*val1 = get_value_for_expr (val1->value, true);
if (TREE_CODE (val2->value) == ADDR_EXPR)
tem = get_value_for_expr (val2->value, true);
ccp_lattice_meet (where, val1, &tem);
ccp_lattice_meet (val1, &tem);
}
else
{
......@@ -1122,7 +1119,7 @@ ccp_visit_phi_node (gphi *phi)
first = false;
}
else
ccp_lattice_meet (gimple_bb (phi), &new_val, &arg_val);
ccp_lattice_meet (&new_val, &arg_val);
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
{
......@@ -1144,7 +1141,7 @@ ccp_visit_phi_node (gphi *phi)
}
/* Make the transition to the new value. */
if (set_lattice_value (gimple_phi_result (phi), new_val))
if (set_lattice_value (gimple_phi_result (phi), &new_val))
{
if (new_val.lattice_val == VARYING)
return SSA_PROP_VARYING;
......@@ -1745,6 +1742,15 @@ evaluate_stmt (gimple stmt)
{
fold_defer_overflow_warnings ();
simplified = ccp_fold (stmt);
if (simplified && TREE_CODE (simplified) == SSA_NAME)
{
val = *get_value (simplified);
if (val.lattice_val != VARYING)
{
fold_undefer_overflow_warnings (true, stmt, 0);
return val;
}
}
is_constant = simplified && is_gimple_min_invariant (simplified);
fold_undefer_overflow_warnings (is_constant, stmt, 0);
if (is_constant)
......@@ -1753,6 +1759,7 @@ evaluate_stmt (gimple stmt)
val.lattice_val = CONSTANT;
val.value = simplified;
val.mask = 0;
return val;
}
}
/* If the statement is likely to have a VARYING result, then do not
......@@ -2293,7 +2300,7 @@ visit_assignment (gimple stmt, tree *output_p)
/* If STMT is an assignment to an SSA_NAME, we only have one
value to set. */
if (set_lattice_value (lhs, val))
if (set_lattice_value (lhs, &val))
{
*output_p = lhs;
if (val.lattice_val == VARYING)
......@@ -2391,10 +2398,7 @@ ccp_visit_stmt (gimple stmt, edge *taken_edge_p, tree *output_p)
SSA_NAMEs represent unknown modifications to their outputs.
Mark them VARYING. */
FOR_EACH_SSA_TREE_OPERAND (def, stmt, iter, SSA_OP_ALL_DEFS)
{
ccp_prop_value_t v = { VARYING, NULL_TREE, -1 };
set_lattice_value (def, v);
}
set_value_varying (def);
return SSA_PROP_VARYING;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment