re PR c++/9252 ([New parser] Errors due to legally used "typename")

	PR c++/9252
	* cp-tree.h (saved_scope): Remove check_access field.
	(tsubst_flags_t): Remove tf_parsing.
	* decl.c (maybe_push_to_top_level): Don't initialize
	scope_chain->check_access.
	(make_typename_type, make_unbound_class_template): Don't use
	tf_parsing.
	(register_dtor_fn): Use push/pop_deferring_access_checks
	instead of scope_chain->check_access.
	* method.c (use_thunk): Likewise.
	* parser.c (cp_parser_explicit_instantiation
	(cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p): Don't call
	push/pop_deferring_access_checks here.
	(cp_parser_template_argument, cp_parser_class_name): Don't use
	tf_parsing.
	(yyparse): Check flag_access_control.
	* pt.c (instantiate_class_template): Call
	push/pop_deferring_access_checks.
	* semantics.c (push_deferring_access_checks): Propagate
	dk_no_check.
	(perform_or_defer_access_check): Make sure basetype_path is
	a type before comparison.
	* call.c (build_op_delete_call, build_over_call): Use
	perform_or_defer_access_check.
	* class.c (alter_access): Likewise.
	* init.c (build_offset_ref): Likewise.
	* lex.c (do_identifier): Likewise.
	* method.c (hack_identifier): Likewise.
	* search.c (lookup_member): Likewise.
	* semantics.c (finish_non_static_data_member): Likewise.
	(simplify_aggr_init_exprs_r): Use push/pop_deferring_access_checks
	instead of flag_access_control.

	* g++.dg/parse/access8.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/parse/access9.C: New test.

From-SVN: r66660

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

 2003-05-10  Kriang Lerdsuwanakij  <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
 
+	PR c++/9252
+	* cp-tree.h (saved_scope): Remove check_access field.
+	(tsubst_flags_t): Remove tf_parsing.
+	* decl.c (maybe_push_to_top_level): Don't initialize
+	scope_chain->check_access.
+	(make_typename_type, make_unbound_class_template): Don't use
+	tf_parsing.
+	(register_dtor_fn): Use push/pop_deferring_access_checks
+	instead of scope_chain->check_access.
+	* method.c (use_thunk): Likewise.
+	* parser.c (cp_parser_explicit_instantiation
+	(cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p): Don't call
+	push/pop_deferring_access_checks here.
+	(cp_parser_template_argument, cp_parser_class_name): Don't use
+	tf_parsing.
+	(yyparse): Check flag_access_control.
+	* pt.c (instantiate_class_template): Call
+	push/pop_deferring_access_checks.
+	* semantics.c (push_deferring_access_checks): Propagate
+	dk_no_check.
+	(perform_or_defer_access_check): Make sure basetype_path is
+	a type before comparison.
+	* call.c (build_op_delete_call, build_over_call): Use
+	perform_or_defer_access_check.
+	* class.c (alter_access): Likewise.
+	* init.c (build_offset_ref): Likewise.
+	* lex.c (do_identifier): Likewise.
+	* method.c (hack_identifier): Likewise.
+	* search.c (lookup_member): Likewise.
+	* semantics.c (finish_non_static_data_member): Likewise.
+	(simplify_aggr_init_exprs_r): Use push/pop_deferring_access_checks
+	instead of flag_access_control.
+
+2003-05-10  Kriang Lerdsuwanakij  <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
+
 	PR c++/9554
 	* parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Remove check_access parameter.
 	All caller adjusted.  Update declaration.

gcc/cp/call.c

@@ -4062,7 +4062,7 @@ build_op_delete_call (enum tree_code code, tree addr, tree size,
       /* If the FN is a member function, make sure that it is
 	 accessible.  */
       if (DECL_CLASS_SCOPE_P (fn))
-	enforce_access (type, fn);
+	perform_or_defer_access_check (type, fn);
 
       if (pass == 0)
 	args = tree_cons (NULL_TREE, addr, args);
@@ -4513,7 +4513,7 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags)
       joust (cand, WRAPPER_ZC (TREE_VALUE (val)), 1);
 
   if (DECL_FUNCTION_MEMBER_P (fn))
-    enforce_access (cand->access_path, fn);
+    perform_or_defer_access_check (cand->access_path, fn);
 
   if (args && TREE_CODE (args) != TREE_LIST)
     args = build_tree_list (NULL_TREE, args);

gcc/cp/class.c

@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ alter_access (tree t, tree fdecl, tree access)
     }
   else
     {
-      enforce_access (t, fdecl);
+      perform_or_defer_access_check (t, fdecl);
       DECL_ACCESS (fdecl) = tree_cons (t, access, DECL_ACCESS (fdecl));
       return 1;
     }

gcc/cp/cp-tree.h

@@ -696,7 +696,6 @@ struct saved_scope GTY(())
   int x_processing_specialization;
   bool x_processing_explicit_instantiation;
   int need_pop_function_context;
-  int check_access;
 
   struct stmt_tree_s x_stmt_tree;
 
@@ -3013,10 +3012,8 @@ typedef enum tsubst_flags_t {
   tf_ignore_bad_quals = 1 << 3, /* ignore bad cvr qualifiers */
   tf_keep_type_decl = 1 << 4,	/* retain typedef type decls
 				   (make_typename_type use) */
-  tf_ptrmem_ok = 1 << 5,     /* pointers to member ok (internal
+  tf_ptrmem_ok = 1 << 5      /* pointers to member ok (internal
 				instantiate_type use) */
-  tf_parsing = 1 << 6	     /* called from parser
-				(make_typename_type use) */
 } tsubst_flags_t;
 
 /* The kind of checking we can do looking in a class hierarchy.  */

gcc/cp/decl.c

@@ -2242,7 +2242,6 @@ maybe_push_to_top_level (int pseudo)
   s->need_pop_function_context = need_pop;
   s->function_decl = current_function_decl;
   s->last_parms = last_function_parms;
-  s->check_access = flag_access_control;
 
   scope_chain = s;
   current_function_decl = NULL_TREE;
@@ -5481,12 +5480,7 @@ make_typename_type (tree context, tree name, tsubst_flags_t complain)
 	    }
 
 	  if (complain & tf_error)
-	    {
-	      if (complain & tf_parsing)
-		perform_or_defer_access_check (context, tmpl);
-	      else
-		enforce_access (context, tmpl);
-	    }
+	    perform_or_defer_access_check (context, tmpl);
 
 	  return lookup_template_class (tmpl,
 					TREE_OPERAND (fullname, 1),
@@ -5516,12 +5510,7 @@ make_typename_type (tree context, tree name, tsubst_flags_t complain)
 		}
 
 	      if (complain & tf_error)
-		{
-	      	  if (complain & tf_parsing)
-		    perform_or_defer_access_check (context, t);
-		  else
-		    enforce_access (context, t);
-		}
+		perform_or_defer_access_check (context, t);
 
 	      if (DECL_ARTIFICIAL (t) || !(complain & tf_keep_type_decl))
 		t = TREE_TYPE (t);
@@ -5578,12 +5567,7 @@ make_unbound_class_template (tree context, tree name, tsubst_flags_t complain)
 	}
       
       if (complain & tf_error)
-	{
-	  if (complain & tf_parsing)
-	    perform_or_defer_access_check (context, tmpl);
-	  else
-	    enforce_access (context, tmpl);
-	}
+	perform_or_defer_access_check (context, tmpl);
 
       return tmpl;
     }
@@ -8447,7 +8431,6 @@ register_dtor_fn (tree decl)
   tree compound_stmt;
   tree args;
   tree fcall;
-  int saved_flag_access_control;
 
   if (TYPE_HAS_TRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
     return;
@@ -8464,10 +8447,10 @@ register_dtor_fn (tree decl)
      to the original function, rather than the anonymous one.  That
      will make the back-end think that nested functions are in use,
      which causes confusion.  */
-  saved_flag_access_control = flag_access_control;
-  scope_chain->check_access = flag_access_control = 0;
+  
+  push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
   fcall = build_cleanup (decl);
-  scope_chain->check_access = flag_access_control = saved_flag_access_control;
+  pop_deferring_access_checks ();
 
   /* Create the body of the anonymous function.  */
   compound_stmt = begin_compound_stmt (/*has_no_scope=*/0);

gcc/cp/init.c

@@ -1662,8 +1662,7 @@ build_offset_ref (type, name)
 	  t = OVL_CURRENT (t);
 
 	  /* unique functions are handled easily.  */
-	  if (!enforce_access (basebinfo, t))
-	    return error_mark_node;
+	  perform_or_defer_access_check (basebinfo, t);
 	  mark_used (t);
 	  if (DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (t))
 	    return t;

gcc/cp/lex.c

@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ do_identifier (token, args)
     {
       /* Check access.  */
       if (IDENTIFIER_CLASS_VALUE (token) == id)
-	enforce_access (CP_DECL_CONTEXT(id), id);
+	perform_or_defer_access_check (CP_DECL_CONTEXT(id), id);
       if (!processing_template_decl || DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (id))
 	id = DECL_INITIAL (id);
     }

gcc/cp/method.c

@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ hack_identifier (tree value, tree name)
 	{
 	  tree path;
 	  path = currently_open_derived_class (DECL_CONTEXT (value));
-	  enforce_access (path, value);
+	  perform_or_defer_access_check (path, value);
 	}
     }
   else if (TREE_CODE (value) == TREE_LIST 
@@ -452,7 +452,6 @@ use_thunk (tree thunk_fndecl, bool emit_p)
 	 doesn't work for varargs.  */
 
       tree a, t;
-      int saved_check_access;
 
       if (varargs_function_p (function))
 	error ("generic thunk code fails for method `%#D' which uses `...'",
@@ -475,8 +474,7 @@ use_thunk (tree thunk_fndecl, bool emit_p)
       /* We don't bother with a body block for thunks.  */
 
       /* There's no need to check accessibility inside the thunk body.  */
-      saved_check_access = scope_chain->check_access;
-      scope_chain->check_access = 0;
+      push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
 
       t = a;
       if (this_adjusting)
@@ -506,7 +504,7 @@ use_thunk (tree thunk_fndecl, bool emit_p)
       DECL_IGNORED_P (thunk_fndecl) = 1;
 
       /* Re-enable access control.  */
-      scope_chain->check_access = saved_check_access;
+      pop_deferring_access_checks ();
 
       expand_body (finish_function (0));
     }

gcc/cp/parser.c

@@ -8244,7 +8244,7 @@ cp_parser_template_argument (cp_parser* parser)
       if (template_p)
 	argument = make_unbound_class_template (TREE_OPERAND (argument, 0),
 						TREE_OPERAND (argument, 1),
-						tf_error | tf_parsing);
+						tf_error);
       else if (TREE_CODE (argument) != TEMPLATE_DECL)
 	cp_parser_error (parser, "expected template-name");
     }
@@ -8301,7 +8301,7 @@ cp_parser_explicit_instantiation (cp_parser* parser)
   begin_explicit_instantiation ();
   /* [temp.explicit] says that we are supposed to ignore access
      control while processing explicit instantiation directives.  */
-  scope_chain->check_access = 0;
+  push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
   /* Parse a decl-specifier-seq.  */
   decl_specifiers 
     = cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq (parser,
@@ -8336,7 +8336,7 @@ cp_parser_explicit_instantiation (cp_parser* parser)
   /* We're done with the instantiation.  */
   end_explicit_instantiation ();
   /* Turn access control back on.  */
-  scope_chain->check_access = flag_access_control;
+  pop_deferring_access_checks ();
 
   cp_parser_consume_semicolon_at_end_of_statement (parser);
 }
@@ -11390,8 +11390,7 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser,
        standard does not seem to be definitive, but there is no other
        valid interpretation of the following `::'.  Therefore, those
        names are considered class-names.  */
-    decl = TYPE_NAME (make_typename_type (scope, decl, 
-					  tf_error | tf_parsing));
+    decl = TYPE_NAME (make_typename_type (scope, decl, tf_error));
   else if (decl == error_mark_node
 	   || TREE_CODE (decl) != TYPE_DECL
 	   || !IS_AGGR_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
@@ -11450,6 +11449,7 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
   saved_num_template_parameter_lists 
     = parser->num_template_parameter_lists; 
   parser->num_template_parameter_lists = 0;
+
   /* Start the class.  */
   type = begin_class_definition (type);
   if (type == error_mark_node)
@@ -13646,8 +13646,6 @@ cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p (cp_parser *parser, bool friend_p)
   /* Assume that we are looking at a constructor declarator.  */
   constructor_p = true;
 
-  push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
-
   /* Look for the optional `::' operator.  */
   cp_parser_global_scope_opt (parser,
 			      /*current_scope_valid_p=*/false);
@@ -13689,8 +13687,6 @@ cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p (cp_parser *parser, bool friend_p)
       constructor_p = !cp_parser_error_occurred (parser);
     }
 
-  pop_deferring_access_checks ();
-
   /* If we're still considering a constructor, we have to see a `(',
      to begin the parameter-declaration-clause, followed by either a
      `)', an `...', or a decl-specifier.  We need to check for a
@@ -14664,7 +14660,8 @@ yyparse (void)
   bool error_occurred;
 
   the_parser = cp_parser_new ();
-  push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_deferred);
+  push_deferring_access_checks (flag_access_control
+				? dk_no_deferred : dk_no_check);
   error_occurred = cp_parser_translation_unit (the_parser);
   the_parser = NULL;
   

gcc/cp/pt.c

@@ -5259,6 +5259,10 @@ instantiate_class_template (type)
      the process of being defined.  */
   TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (type) = 1;
 
+  /* We may be in the middle of deferred access check.  Disable
+     it now.  */
+  push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_deferred);
+
   maybe_push_to_top_level (uses_template_parms (type));
 
   if (t)
@@ -5568,6 +5572,7 @@ instantiate_class_template (type)
 
   popclass ();
   pop_from_top_level ();
+  pop_deferring_access_checks ();
   pop_tinst_level ();
 
   if (TYPE_CONTAINS_VPTR_P (type))

gcc/cp/search.c

@@ -913,10 +913,6 @@ accessible_p (tree type, tree decl)
      accessibility in TYPE.  */
   int protected_ok = 0;
 
-  /* If we're not checking access, everything is accessible.  */
-  if (!scope_chain->check_access)
-    return 1;
-
   /* If this declaration is in a block or namespace scope, there's no
      access control.  */
   if (!TYPE_P (context_for_name_lookup (decl)))
@@ -1293,9 +1289,8 @@ lookup_member (tree xbasetype, tree name, int protect, bool want_type)
 
      In the case of overloaded function names, access control is
      applied to the function selected by overloaded resolution.  */
-  if (rval && protect && !is_overloaded_fn (rval)
-      && !enforce_access (xbasetype, rval))
-    return error_mark_node;
+  if (rval && protect && !is_overloaded_fn (rval))
+    perform_or_defer_access_check (xbasetype, rval);
 
   if (errstr && protect)
     {

gcc/cp/semantics.c

@@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ void push_deferring_access_checks (deferring_kind deferring)
 {
   deferred_access *d;
 
+  /* For context like template instantiation, access checking
+     disabling applies to all nested context.  */
+  if (deferred_access_stack
+      && deferred_access_stack->deferring_access_checks_kind == dk_no_check)
+    deferring = dk_no_check;
+
   /* Recycle previously used free store if available.  */
   if (deferred_access_free_list)
     {
@@ -266,6 +272,7 @@ void perform_or_defer_access_check (tree class_type, tree decl)
        check;
        check = TREE_CHAIN (check))
     if (TREE_VALUE (check) == decl
+	&& TYPE_P (TREE_PURPOSE (check))
 	&& same_type_p (TREE_PURPOSE (check), class_type))
       return;
   /* If not, record the check.  */
@@ -1276,7 +1283,7 @@ finish_non_static_data_member (tree decl, tree qualifying_scope)
 	    access_type = DECL_CONTEXT (access_type);
 	}
 
-      enforce_access (access_type, decl);
+      perform_or_defer_access_check (access_type, decl);
 
       /* If the data member was named `C::M', convert `*this' to `C'
 	 first.  */
@@ -2301,12 +2308,10 @@ simplify_aggr_init_exprs_r (tp, walk_subtrees, data)
       /* If we're using the non-reentrant PCC calling convention, then we
 	 need to copy the returned value out of the static buffer into the
 	 SLOT.  */
-      int old_ac = flag_access_control;
-
-      flag_access_control = 0;
+      push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
       call_expr = build_aggr_init (slot, call_expr,
 				   DIRECT_BIND | LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING);
-      flag_access_control = old_ac;
+      pop_deferring_access_checks ();
     }
 
   /* We want to use the value of the initialized location as the

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

 2003-05-10  Kriang Lerdsuwanakij  <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
 
+	PR c++/9252
+	* g++.dg/template/access8.C: New test.
+	* g++.dg/template/access9.C: New test.
+
+2003-05-10  Kriang Lerdsuwanakij  <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
+
 	PR c++/9554
 	* g++.dg/parse/access1.C: New test.
 

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access8.C

+// Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation
+// Contributed by Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+// Template instantiate during deferred access check
+
+template <class T> struct C {
+  typedef typename T::X Y;
+};
+
+class A {
+  typedef int X;
+  template <class T> friend struct C;
+};
+
+C<A>::Y f(int);

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access9.C

+// Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation
+// Contributed by Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+// Template instantiate during deferred access check
+
+template <void (*)(int)> struct C {
+  typedef int Y;
+};
+
+template <class T> void f(typename T::X) {
+}
+
+class A {
+  typedef int X;
+  template <class T> friend void f(typename T::X);
+};
+
+C<&f<A> >::Y g(int);