Commit 6da97b7b by Nicola Pero Committed by Nicola Pero

Updated comments in objc-act.c

From-SVN: r170299
parent d4c433f9
2011-01-19 Nicola Pero <nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com>
* objc-act.c (objc_init, generate_struct_by_value_array): Updated
comments.
2011-01-19 Nicola Pero <nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com>
* objc-act.c: Updated comments.
* objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c: Same.
* objc-runtime-shared-support.c: Same.
......
......@@ -330,8 +330,9 @@ generate_struct_by_value_array (void)
int aggregate_in_mem[32];
int found = 0;
/* ??? as an example, m64/ppc/Darwin can pass up to 8*long+13*double in regs.
Presumably no platform passes 32 byte structures in a register. */
/* Presumably no platform passes 32 byte structures in a register. */
/* ??? As an example, m64/ppc/Darwin can pass up to 8*long+13*double
in registers. */
for (i = 1; i < 32; i++)
{
char buffer[5];
......@@ -379,8 +380,24 @@ objc_init (void)
#endif
return false;
/* print_struct_values is triggered by -print-runtime-info (used
when building libobjc, with an empty file as input). It does not
require any ObjC setup, and it never returns.
-fcompare-debug is used to check the compiler output; we are
executed twice, once with flag_compare_debug set, and once with
it not set. If the flag is used together with
-print-runtime-info, we want to print the runtime info only once,
else it would be output in duplicate. So we check
flag_compare_debug to output it in only one of the invocations.
As a side effect, this also that means -fcompare-debug
-print-runtime-info will run the compiler twice, and compare the
generated assembler file; the first time the compiler exits
immediately (producing no file), and the second time it compiles
an empty file. This checks, as a side effect, that compiling an
empty file produces no assembler output. */
if (print_struct_values && !flag_compare_debug)
/* This routine does not require any ObjC set-up and never returns. */
generate_struct_by_value_array ();
/* Set up stuff used by FE parser and all runtimes. */
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment