Commit 6c2a6a85 by Toon Moene Committed by Toon Moene

bugs.texi: Note that debugging information for common block items is emitted now.

2000-05-28  Toon Moene  <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

	* bugs.texi: Note that debugging information for
	common block items is emitted now.
	* news.texi: Ditto.

From-SVN: r34231
parent 5828d725
2000-05-28 Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
* bugs.texi: Note that debugging information for
common block items is emitted now.
* news.texi: Ditto.
2000-05-18 Chris Demetriou <cgd@sibyte.com>
* com.h (FFECOM_f2cINTEGER, FFECOM_f2cLONGINT): Note that
......
......@@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ for information on how to change the point at which
@cindex equivalence areas
@cindex local equivalence areas
@item
@code{g77} doesn't emit variable and array members of common blocks for use
Previous versions of @code{g77} didn't emit information on
variable and array members of common blocks for use
with a debugger (the @samp{-g} command-line option).
The code is present to do this, but doesn't work with at least
one debug format---perhaps it works with others.
And it turns out there's a similar bug for
local equivalence areas, so that has been disabled as well.
As of the version of @code{g77} shipped with version 3.0 of
@code{GCC}, this is corrected. However, there's a similar bug for
local equivalence areas, which hasn't been repaired yet.
As of Version 0.5.19, a temporary kludge solution is provided whereby
some rudimentary information on a member is written as a string that
......
......@@ -155,6 +155,13 @@ The following information was last updated on @value{last-update-news}:
@itemize @bullet
@ifclear USERVISONLY
@item
Using options @code{-g}, @code{-ggdb} or @code{-gdwarf[-2]} (where
appropriate for your target) now also enables debugging information
for COMMON BLOCK items to be emitted.
@end ifclear
@ifclear USERVISONLY
@item
The @code{TtyNam} intrinsics now set @var{Name} to all spaces (at run time)
if the system has no @code{ttyname} implementation available.
@end ifclear
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment