Commit 695e4773 by Graham Stott Committed by Graham Stott

regrename.c (scan_rtx_rtx): Skip to the next chain on encountering a terminated chain.


        * regrename.c (scan_rtx_rtx): Skip to the next chain on
        encountering a terminated chain.

From-SVN: r37473
parent 928c4ba2
2000-11-15 Graham Stott <grahams@redhat.com>
* regrename.c (scan_rtx_rtx): Skip to the next chain on
encountering a terminated chain.
2000-11-14 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* configure.in: Move check for V3 above check for C++ header-file
......
......@@ -307,62 +307,75 @@ scan_rtx_reg (insn, loc, class, action, type)
for (p = &open_chains; *p;)
{
struct du_chain *this = *p;
int regno = REGNO (*this->loc);
int nregs = HARD_REGNO_NREGS (regno, GET_MODE (*this->loc));
int exact_match = (regno == this_regno && nregs == this_nregs);
if (regno + nregs <= this_regno
|| this_regno + this_nregs <= regno)
p = &this->next_chain;
else if (action == mark_read)
{
if (! exact_match)
abort ();
if (class == NO_REGS)
abort ();
/* Check if the chain has been terminated if it has then skip to
the next chain.
this = (struct du_chain *)
obstack_alloc (&rename_obstack, sizeof (struct du_chain));
this->next_use = *p;
this->next_chain = (*p)->next_chain;
this->loc = loc;
this->insn = insn;
this->class = class;
this->need_caller_save_reg = 0;
*p = this;
return;
}
else if (action != terminate_overlapping_read || ! exact_match)
{
struct du_chain *next = this->next_chain;
/* Whether the terminated chain can be used for renaming
depends on the action and this being an exact match.
In either case, we remove this element from open_chains. */
This can happen when we've already appended the location to
the chain in Step 3, but are trying to hide in-out operands
from terminate_write in Step 5. */
if ((action == terminate_dead || action == terminate_write)
&& exact_match)
if (*this->loc == cc0_rtx)
p = &this->next_chain;
else
{
int regno = REGNO (*this->loc);
int nregs = HARD_REGNO_NREGS (regno, GET_MODE (*this->loc));
int exact_match = (regno == this_regno && nregs == this_nregs);
if (regno + nregs <= this_regno
|| this_regno + this_nregs <= regno)
p = &this->next_chain;
else if (action == mark_read)
{
this->next_chain = closed_chains;
closed_chains = this;
if (rtl_dump_file)
fprintf (rtl_dump_file,
"Closing chain %s at insn %d (%s)\n",
reg_names[REGNO (*this->loc)], INSN_UID (insn),
scan_actions_name[(int) action]);
if (! exact_match)
abort ();
if (class == NO_REGS)
abort ();
this = (struct du_chain *)
obstack_alloc (&rename_obstack, sizeof (struct du_chain));
this->next_use = *p;
this->next_chain = (*p)->next_chain;
this->loc = loc;
this->insn = insn;
this->class = class;
this->need_caller_save_reg = 0;
*p = this;
return;
}
else
else if (action != terminate_overlapping_read || ! exact_match)
{
if (rtl_dump_file)
fprintf (rtl_dump_file,
"Discarding chain %s at insn %d (%s)\n",
reg_names[REGNO (*this->loc)], INSN_UID (insn),
scan_actions_name[(int) action]);
struct du_chain *next = this->next_chain;
/* Whether the terminated chain can be used for renaming
depends on the action and this being an exact match.
In either case, we remove this element from open_chains. */
if ((action == terminate_dead || action == terminate_write)
&& exact_match)
{
this->next_chain = closed_chains;
closed_chains = this;
if (rtl_dump_file)
fprintf (rtl_dump_file,
"Closing chain %s at insn %d (%s)\n",
reg_names[REGNO (*this->loc)], INSN_UID (insn),
scan_actions_name[(int) action]);
}
else
{
if (rtl_dump_file)
fprintf (rtl_dump_file,
"Discarding chain %s at insn %d (%s)\n",
reg_names[REGNO (*this->loc)], INSN_UID (insn),
scan_actions_name[(int) action]);
}
*p = next;
}
*p = next;
else
p = &this->next_chain;
}
else
p = &this->next_chain;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment