Commit 5f07d78a by Jakub Jelinek Committed by Jakub Jelinek

tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (find_inv_vars): Fix a comment typo.

	* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (find_inv_vars): Fix a comment typo.

	* c-typeck.c (convert_for_assignment): Fix a comment typo.

From-SVN: r267882
parent bbf18dc5
2019-01-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (find_inv_vars): Fix a comment typo.
2019-01-12 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_goacc_validate_dims_1): In offloading
......
2019-01-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* c-typeck.c (convert_for_assignment): Fix a comment typo.
2019-01-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/88701
......
......@@ -7283,7 +7283,7 @@ convert_for_assignment (location_t location, location_t expr_loc, tree type,
}
}
/* If RHS is't an address, check pointer or array of packed
/* If RHS isn't an address, check pointer or array of packed
struct or union. */
warn_for_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member
(TREE_CODE (orig_rhs) != ADDR_EXPR, type, orig_rhs);
......
......@@ -3037,7 +3037,7 @@ find_inv_vars (struct ivopts_data *data, tree *expr_p, bitmap *inv_vars)
It's hard to make decision whether constant part should be stripped
or not. We choose to not strip based on below facts:
1) We need to count ADD cost for constant part if it's stripped,
which is't always trivial where this functions is called.
which isn't always trivial where this functions is called.
2) Stripping constant away may be conflict with following loop
invariant hoisting pass.
3) Not stripping constant away results in more invariant exprs,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment