c-decl.c (build_array_declarator): Say 'ISO C90', not 'ISO C89'.

2002-07-21  Gabriel Dos Reis  <gdr@nerim.net>

        * c-decl.c (build_array_declarator): Say 'ISO C90', not 'ISO C89'.
        (grokdeclarator): Likewise.
        * c-format.c (C_STD_NAME): Likewise.
        * c-lex.c (interpret_integer): Likewise.
        * c-typeck.c (build_array_ref): Likewise.
        * cpplex.c (_cpp_lex_direct): Likewise.
        * toplev.c (documented_lang_options): Likewise.

testsuite/
2002-07-21  Gabriel Dos Reis  <gdr@nerim.net>

        * gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c: Change C89 too C90.

From-SVN: r55629

gcc/ChangeLog

+2002-07-21  Gabriel Dos Reis  <gdr@nerim.net>
+
+	* c-decl.c (build_array_declarator): Say 'ISO C90', not 'ISO C89'.
+	(grokdeclarator): Likewise.
+	* c-format.c (C_STD_NAME): Likewise.
+	* c-lex.c (interpret_integer): Likewise.
+	* c-typeck.c (build_array_ref): Likewise.
+	* cpplex.c (_cpp_lex_direct): Likewise.
+	* toplev.c (documented_lang_options): Likewise.
+
 2002-07-21  Neil Booth  <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
 
 	* c-format.c (T99_I, T99_UI): Remove.

gcc/c-decl.c

@@ -3115,9 +3115,9 @@ build_array_declarator (expr, quals, static_p, vla_unspec_p)
   if (pedantic && !flag_isoc99)
     {
       if (static_p || quals != NULL_TREE)
-	pedwarn ("ISO C89 does not support `static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators");
+	pedwarn ("ISO C90 does not support `static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators");
       if (vla_unspec_p)
-	pedwarn ("ISO C89 does not support `[*]' array declarators");
+	pedwarn ("ISO C90 does not support `[*]' array declarators");
     }
   if (vla_unspec_p)
     warning ("GCC does not yet properly implement `[*]' array declarators");
@@ -3909,7 +3909,7 @@ grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, decl_context, initialized)
 		    {
 		      if (pedantic && !flag_isoc99 && ! in_system_header
 			  && warn_long_long)
-			pedwarn ("ISO C89 does not support `long long'");
+			pedwarn ("ISO C90 does not support `long long'");
 		      longlong = 1;
 		    }
 		}
@@ -4110,7 +4110,7 @@ grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, decl_context, initialized)
   if (specbits & 1 << (int) RID_COMPLEX)
     {
       if (pedantic && !flag_isoc99)
-	pedwarn ("ISO C89 does not support complex types");
+	pedwarn ("ISO C90 does not support complex types");
       /* If we just have "complex", it is equivalent to
 	 "complex double", but if any modifiers at all are specified it is
 	 the complex form of TYPE.  E.g, "complex short" is
@@ -4388,10 +4388,10 @@ grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, decl_context, initialized)
 		  if (!flag_isoc99 && pedantic)
 		    {
 		      if (TREE_CONSTANT (size))
-			pedwarn ("ISO C89 forbids array `%s' whose size can't be evaluated",
+			pedwarn ("ISO C90 forbids array `%s' whose size can't be evaluated",
 				 name);
 		      else
-			pedwarn ("ISO C89 forbids variable-size array `%s'",
+			pedwarn ("ISO C90 forbids variable-size array `%s'",
 				 name);
 		    }
 		}
@@ -4434,7 +4434,7 @@ grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, decl_context, initialized)
 	  else if (decl_context == FIELD)
 	    {
 	      if (pedantic && !flag_isoc99 && !in_system_header)
-		pedwarn ("ISO C89 does not support flexible array members");
+		pedwarn ("ISO C90 does not support flexible array members");
 
 	      /* ISO C99 Flexible array members are effectively identical
 		 to GCC's zero-length array extension.  */

gcc/c-format.c

@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ enum format_std_version
 				 ? "ISO C++"			\
 				 : ((FEATURE_VER) == STD_EXT	\
 				    ? "ISO C"			\
-				    : "ISO C89"))
+				    : "ISO C90"))
 /* Adjust a C standard version, which may be STD_C9L, to account for
    -Wno-long-long.  Returns other standard versions unchanged.  */
 #define ADJ_STD(VER)		((int)((VER) == STD_C9L			      \

gcc/c-lex.c

@@ -853,10 +853,10 @@ interpret_integer (token, flags)
 		  if (itk_u < itk_unsigned_long)
 		    itk_u = itk_unsigned_long;
 		  itk = itk_u;
-		  warning ("this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C89");
+		  warning ("this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90");
 		}
 	      else if (warn_traditional)
-		warning ("this decimal constant would be unsigned in ISO C89");
+		warning ("this decimal constant would be unsigned in ISO C90");
 	    }
 	}
     }

gcc/c-typeck.c

@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ build_array_ref (array, index)
 	  if (TREE_CODE (foo) == VAR_DECL && DECL_REGISTER (foo))
 	    pedwarn ("ISO C forbids subscripting `register' array");
 	  else if (! flag_isoc99 && ! lvalue_p (foo))
-	    pedwarn ("ISO C89 forbids subscripting non-lvalue array");
+	    pedwarn ("ISO C90 forbids subscripting non-lvalue array");
 	}
 
       type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (array)));

gcc/cpplex.c

@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ _cpp_lex_direct (pfile)
 	      && ! buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments)
 	    {
 	      cpp_error (pfile, DL_PEDWARN,
-			 "C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C89");
+			 "C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90");
 	      cpp_error (pfile, DL_PEDWARN,
 			 "(this will be reported only once per input file)");
 	      buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments = 1;

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2002-07-21  Gabriel Dos Reis  <gdr@nerim.net>
+
+	* gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c: Change C89 too C90.
+
 2002-07-20  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>
 
 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c: New testcase.

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c

@@ -8,24 +8,24 @@
    it correctly, so gives a warning about this. so we can't yet test here
    that we get just one error and no warnings.  */
 
-void foo0 (int a, int b[*]); /* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[*\] not in C89" } */
+void foo0 (int a, int b[*]); /* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[*\] not in C90" } */
 /* { dg-warning "implement" "\[*\] not implemented" { target *-*-* } 11 } */
-void foo1 (int, int [*]); /* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[*\] not in C89" } */
+void foo1 (int, int [*]); /* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[*\] not in C90" } */
 /* { dg-warning "implement" "\[*\] not implemented" { target *-*-* } 13 } */
 
 /* Use of static and type qualifiers (not allowed with abstract declarators)
    is a C99 feature.  */
 
 void bar0 (int a[const]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */
-/* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[quals\] not in C89" { target *-*-* } 19 } */
+/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[quals\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 19 } */
 void bar1 (int a[const 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */
-/* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[quals expr\] not in C89" { target *-*-* } 21 } */
+/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[quals expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 21 } */
 void bar2 (int a[static 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */
-/* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[static expr\] not in C89" { target *-*-* } 23 } */
+/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[static expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 23 } */
 void bar3 (int a[static const 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */
-/* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[static quals expr\] not in C89" { target *-*-* } 25 } */
+/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[static quals expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 25 } */
 void bar4 (int a[const static 2]); /* { dg-bogus "warning" "warning in place of error" } */
-/* { dg-error "ISO C89" "\[quals static expr\] not in C89" { target *-*-* } 27 } */
+/* { dg-error "ISO C90" "\[quals static expr\] not in C90" { target *-*-* } 27 } */
 
 /* Because [*] isn't properly implemented and so warns, we don't test here
    for [const *] yet.  */

gcc/toplev.c

@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ documented_lang_options[] =
      enabled by default.  */
 
   { "-ansi",
-    N_("Compile just for ISO C89") },
+    N_("Compile just for ISO C90") },
   { "-std= ",
     N_("Determine language standard") },