Commit 4ef8e8f5 by Gavin Romig-Koch Committed by Gavin Romig-Koch

For gcc:

	* tree.c (lang_unsave_expr_now) : Correct return type.
	* tree.h (lang_unsave_expr_now) : Same.

For gcc/cp:
	* cp-tree.h (cplus_unsave_expr_now) : Correct return type.
	* tree.h (cplus_unsave_expr_now) : Same.

From-SVN: r28906
parent 59de811e
Thu Aug 26 16:10:56 1999 Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin@cygnus.com>
* tree.c (lang_unsave_expr_now) : Correct return type.
* tree.h (lang_unsave_expr_now) : Same.
Thu Aug 26 13:12:29 1999 Jeffrey A Law (law@cygnus.com)
* pa.c (cint_ok_for_move): Use CONST_INT_OK_FOR_LETTER_P macros
......
1999-08-26 Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin@cygnus.com>
* cp-tree.h (cplus_unsave_expr_now) : Correct return type.
* tree.h (cplus_unsave_expr_now) : Same.
1999-08-25 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Amend comment.
......
......@@ -3413,7 +3413,7 @@ extern tree arbitrate_lookup PROTO((tree, tree, tree));
/* in tree.c */
extern void init_cplus_unsave PROTO((void));
extern tree cplus_unsave_expr_now PROTO((tree));
extern void cplus_unsave_expr_now PROTO((tree));
extern int pod_type_p PROTO((tree));
extern void unshare_base_binfos PROTO((tree));
extern int member_p PROTO((tree));
......
......@@ -2866,7 +2866,7 @@ init_cplus_unsave ()
/* The C++ version of unsave_expr_now.
See gcc/tree.c:unsave_expr_now for comments. */
tree
void
cplus_unsave_expr_now (expr)
tree expr;
{
......
......@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void gcc_obstack_init ();
/* If non-null, a language specific helper for unsave_expr_now. */
int (*lang_unsave_expr_now) PROTO((tree));
void (*lang_unsave_expr_now) PROTO((tree));
/* Init the principal obstacks. */
......
......@@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ extern tree unsave_expr_now PROTO((tree));
/* If non-null, a language specific helper for unsave_expr_now. */
extern int (*lang_unsave_expr_now) PROTO((tree));
extern void (*lang_unsave_expr_now) PROTO((tree));
/* Return 1 if EXP contains a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR; i.e., if it represents a size
or offset that depends on a field within a record.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment