Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
4d9a07db
Commit
4d9a07db
authored
26 years ago
by
Craig Burley
Committed by
Craig Burley
26 years ago
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
turn LSTAT/STAT checking back on
From-SVN: r26615
parent
f658f695
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
6 additions
and
4 deletions
+6
-4
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+5
-0
gcc/testsuite/g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f
+1
-4
No files found.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
View file @
4d9a07db
1999-04-24 Craig Burley <craig@jcb-sc.com>
* g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f (main): Bug involving
LSTAT has been fixed, so turn back on full checking.
1999-04-20 Craig Burley <craig@jcb-sc.com>
* g77.f-torture/compile/19990419-0.f: New test.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
gcc/testsuite/g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f
View file @
4d9a07db
...
...
@@ -233,10 +233,7 @@ C the better to test with, my dear! (-- burley)
end do
i = lstat ('foo', fstatb)
do i=1,13
c For some reason that I haven't investigated, some people see
c failures with the 7th element which doesn't seem to indicate a u77
c bug.
if (fstatb (i) .ne. statb (i) .and. i .ne. 7) then
if (fstatb (i) .ne. statb (i)) then
write (6,*) '*** LSTAT and STAT don''t agree on '//
+ 'array element ', i, ' value ', fstatb (i), statb (i)
call abort
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment