Update aarch64/vmov_n_1.c

Update vmov_n_1.c now we are generating better code for dup:

        ldr     s0, [x0]
        dup     v0.2s, v0.s[0]
        ret

    gcc/testsuite/
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vmov_n_1.c: Update dup scan-assembler.

From-SVN: r252077

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2017-09-13  Wilco Dijkstra  <wdijkstr@arm.com>
+
+	* gcc.target/aarch64/vmov_n_1.c: Update dup scan-assembler.
+
 2017-09-13  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com>
 
 	* gcc.target/arm/acle/cdp.c: Skip __ARM_FEATURE_COPROC check for

gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vmov_n_1.c

@@ -190,8 +190,9 @@ TESTFUNC_NAME (reg_len, data_type, data_len) ()	\
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (64, 32, f)
 TESTFUNC (64, 32, f)
-/* "dup  Vd.2s, Rn" is less preferable then "dup  Vd.2s, Vn.s[lane]".  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2s, v\[0-9\]+\.s\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 1 } } */
+/* "dup  Vd.2s, Rn" is less preferable than "dup  Vd.2s, Vn.s[lane]".  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2s, w\[0-9\]+" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2s, v\[0-9\]+\.s\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 3 } } */
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (64, 64, f)
 TESTFUNC (64, 64, f)
@@ -216,7 +217,9 @@ TESTFUNC (64, 16, s)
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (64, 32, s)
 TESTFUNC (64, 32, s)
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2s, w\[0-9\]+" 2 } } */
+/* "dup  Vd.2s, Rn" is less preferable than "dup  Vd.2s, Vn.s[lane]".  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2s, w\[0-9\]+" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2s, v\[0-9\]+\.s\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 3 } } */
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (64, 64, s)
 TESTFUNC (64, 64, s)
@@ -242,13 +245,15 @@ TESTFUNC (64, 64, u)
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (128, 32, f)
 TESTFUNC (128, 32, f)
-/* "dup  Vd.4s, Rn" is less preferable then "dup  Vd.4s, Vn.s[lane]".  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.4s, v\[0-9\]+\.s\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 1 } } */
+/* "dup  Vd.4s, Rn" is less preferable than "dup  Vd.4s, Vn.s[lane]".  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.4s, w\[0-9\]+" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.4s, v\[0-9\]+\.s\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 3 } } */
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (128, 64, f)
 TESTFUNC (128, 64, f)
-/* "dup  Vd.2d, Rn" is less preferable then "dup  Vd.2d, Vn.d[lane]".  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2d, v\[0-9\]+\.d\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 1 } } */
+/* "dup  Vd.2d, Rn" is less preferable than "dup  Vd.2d, Vn.d[lane]".  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2d, x\[0-9\]+" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2d, v\[0-9\]+\.d\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 3 } } */
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (128, 8, p)
 TESTFUNC (128, 8, p)
@@ -268,11 +273,15 @@ TESTFUNC (128, 16, s)
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (128, 32, s)
 TESTFUNC (128, 32, s)
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.4s, w\[0-9\]+" 2 } } */
+/* "dup  Vd.4s, Rn" is less preferable than "dup  Vd.4s, Vn.s[lane]".  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.4s, w\[0-9\]+" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.4s, v\[0-9\]+\.s\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 3 } } */
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (128, 64, s)
 TESTFUNC (128, 64, s)
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2d, x\[0-9\]+" 2 } } */
+/* "dup  Vd.2d, Rn" is less preferable than "dup  Vd.2d, Vn.d[lane]".  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2d, x\[0-9\]+" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "dup\\tv\[0-9\]+\.2d, v\[0-9\]+\.d\\\[\[0-9\]+\\\]" 3 } } */
 
 OBSCURE_FUNC (128, 8, u)
 TESTFUNC (128, 8, u)