c++: Fix ICE with CONSTRUCTOR flags verification [PR93559]
Since reshape_init_array_1 can now reuse a single constructor for an array of non-aggregate type, we might run into a scenario where we reuse a constructor with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS. This broke this test because we have something like { { expr } } and we try to reshape it, so we recurse on the inner CONSTRUCTOR, reuse an existing CONSTRUCTOR with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS, and then ICE on the discrepancy because the outermost CONSTRUCTOR doesn't have TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS. In this case EXPR was a call to an operator function so TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS should be set. Naturally one would want to fix this by calling recompute_constructor_flags in an appropriate place so that the flags on the CONSTRUCTORs match. The appropriate place would be at the end of reshape_init, but this breaks initlist109.C: there we are dealing with { { TARGET_EXPR <{}> } } where the outermost { } is TREE_CONSTANT but the inner { } is not, so recompute_constructor_flags would clear the constant flag in the outermost { }. Seems resonable but it upsets check_initializer which then complains about "non-constant in-class initialization invalid for static member". TARGET_EXPRs are always created with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS on, but that is mutually exclusive with TREE_CONSTANT. So we're in a bind. Fixed by not reusing a CONSTRUCTOR that has TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS; in the grand scheme of things it isn't measurable: it only affects ~3 tests in the testsuite. PR c++/93559 - ICE with CONSTRUCTOR flags verification. * decl.c (reshape_init_array_1): Don't reuse a CONSTRUCTOR with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS. * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist119.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist120.C: New test.
Showing
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist119.C
0 → 100644
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist120.C
0 → 100644
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment