Commit 3c869ac3 by Richard Sandiford Committed by Richard Sandiford

Avoid GCC 4.1 build failure in fold-const.c

We had:

	      tree t = fold_vec_perm (type, arg1, arg2,
				      vec_perm_indices (sel, 2, nelts));

where fold_vec_perm takes a const vec_perm_indices &.  GCC 4.1 apparently
required a public copy constructor:

gcc/vec-perm-indices.h:85: error: 'vec_perm_indices::vec_perm_indices(const vec_perm_indices&)' is private
gcc/fold-const.c:11410: error: within this context

even though no copy should be made here.  This patch tries to work
around that by constructing the vec_perm_indices separately.

2018-01-16  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>

gcc/
	* fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Construct the vec_perm_indices
	in a separate statement.

From-SVN: r256740
parent cce6078d
2018-01-16 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
* fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Construct the vec_perm_indices
in a separate statement.
2018-01-16 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses):
2018-01-16 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
......
......@@ -11406,8 +11406,8 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type,
else /* Currently unreachable. */
return NULL_TREE;
}
tree t = fold_vec_perm (type, arg1, arg2,
vec_perm_indices (sel, 2, nelts));
vec_perm_indices indices (sel, 2, nelts);
tree t = fold_vec_perm (type, arg1, arg2, indices);
if (t != NULL_TREE)
return t;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment