Commit 3684bbb0 by Hans-Peter Nilsson

testsuite: effective_target_march_option: support checking for -march=*

	* lib/target-supports.exp (effective_target_march_option): New.

I see no (other) way to, depending on the absence of an option,
add an option for a specific target.

For gcc.dg/torture/pr26515.c and cris-elf, you get an error for
supplying multiple (different) -march=... options (where that
error is desirable), like testing cris-elf with
RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=cris-sim/arch=v8, where otherwise
-march=v10 and -march=v8 will both be given, and the test would
fail.

For historians, this was accidentally misordered and committed after
the (first) patch using march_option.  Oops.
parent 0042bafd
......@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
-march=v10 option on target ! march_option.
* gcc.target/cris/asm-v10.S, gcc.target/cris/inasm-v10.c,
gcc.target/cris/sync-1-v10.c: Similar.
* lib/target-supports.exp (effective_target_march_option): New.
2020-01-19 Thomas König <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
......
......@@ -2477,6 +2477,10 @@ proc check_effective_target_ti_c64xp { } {
}]
}
# Check if a -march=... option is given, as part of (earlier) options.
proc check_effective_target_march_option { } {
return [check-flags [list "" { *-*-* } { "-march=*" } { "" } ]]
}
proc check_alpha_max_hw_available { } {
return [check_runtime alpha_max_hw_available {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment