Commit 3371362c by H.J. Lu Committed by H.J. Lu

re PR driver/34904 (-march=native doesn't work with multiple input files)

2008-01-24  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	PR driver/34904
	* gcc.c (SWITCH_OK): Removed.
	(SWITCH_LIVE): Changed to bit.
	(SWITCH_FALSE): Likewise.
	(SWITCH_IGNORE): Likewise.
	(switchstr): Change live_cond to unsigned int.
	(process_command): Replace SWITCH_OK with 0.
	(do_self_spec): Likewise.
	(set_collect_gcc_options): Check the SWITCH_IGNORE bit.
	(give_switch): Likewise.
	(used_arg): Likewise.
	(do_spec_1): Set the SWITCH_IGNORE bit.
	(check_live_switch): Check both SWITCH_LIVE and SWITCH_FALSE
	bits.  Set the SWITCH_LIVE bit.

From-SVN: r131802
parent c496dbb3
2008-01-24 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR driver/34904
* gcc.c (SWITCH_OK): Removed.
(SWITCH_LIVE): Changed to bit.
(SWITCH_FALSE): Likewise.
(SWITCH_IGNORE): Likewise.
(switchstr): Change live_cond to unsigned int.
(process_command): Replace SWITCH_OK with 0.
(do_self_spec): Likewise.
(set_collect_gcc_options): Check the SWITCH_IGNORE bit.
(give_switch): Likewise.
(used_arg): Likewise.
(do_spec_1): Set the SWITCH_IGNORE bit.
(check_live_switch): Check both SWITCH_LIVE and SWITCH_FALSE
bits. Set the SWITCH_LIVE bit.
2008-01-24 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1@de.ibm.com>
* config/s390/s390.h (MOVE_RATIO): Define new target macro.
......
......@@ -3082,24 +3082,22 @@ See %s for instructions.",
If a switch uses following arguments, then the `part1' field
is the switch itself and the `args' field
is a null-terminated vector containing the following arguments.
The `live_cond' field is:
0 when initialized
1 if the switch is true in a conditional spec,
-1 if false (overridden by a later switch)
-2 if this switch should be ignored (used in %<S)
Bits in the `live_cond' field are:
SWITCH_LIVE to indicate this switch is true in a conditional spec.
SWITCH_FALSE to indicate this switch is overridden by a later switch.
SWITCH_IGNORE to indicate this switch should be ignored (used in %<S).
The `validated' field is nonzero if any spec has looked at this switch;
if it remains zero at the end of the run, it must be meaningless. */
#define SWITCH_OK 0
#define SWITCH_FALSE -1
#define SWITCH_IGNORE -2
#define SWITCH_LIVE 1
#define SWITCH_LIVE 0x1
#define SWITCH_FALSE 0x2
#define SWITCH_IGNORE 0x4
struct switchstr
{
const char *part1;
const char **args;
int live_cond;
unsigned int live_cond;
unsigned char validated;
unsigned char ordering;
};
......@@ -4119,7 +4117,7 @@ warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.\n\n"
-e0 or -e1 down into the linker. */
switches[n_switches].part1 = &argv[i][0];
switches[n_switches].args = 0;
switches[n_switches].live_cond = SWITCH_OK;
switches[n_switches].live_cond = 0;
switches[n_switches].validated = 0;
n_switches++;
}
......@@ -4230,7 +4228,7 @@ warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.\n\n"
else
switches[n_switches].args = 0;
switches[n_switches].live_cond = SWITCH_OK;
switches[n_switches].live_cond = 0;
switches[n_switches].validated = 0;
switches[n_switches].ordering = 0;
/* These are always valid, since gcc.c itself understands the
......@@ -4311,7 +4309,7 @@ set_collect_gcc_options (void)
first_time = FALSE;
/* Ignore elided switches. */
if (switches[i].live_cond == SWITCH_IGNORE)
if ((switches[i].live_cond & SWITCH_IGNORE) != 0)
continue;
obstack_grow (&collect_obstack, "'-", 2);
......@@ -4539,7 +4537,7 @@ do_self_spec (const char *spec)
sw = &switches[i + first];
sw->part1 = &argbuf[i][1];
sw->args = 0;
sw->live_cond = SWITCH_OK;
sw->live_cond = 0;
sw->validated = 0;
sw->ordering = 0;
}
......@@ -5289,7 +5287,7 @@ do_spec_1 (const char *spec, int inswitch, const char *soft_matched_part)
if (!strncmp (switches[i].part1, p, len - have_wildcard)
&& (have_wildcard || switches[i].part1[len] == '\0'))
{
switches[i].live_cond = SWITCH_IGNORE;
switches[i].live_cond |= SWITCH_IGNORE;
switches[i].validated = 1;
}
......@@ -5907,7 +5905,8 @@ check_live_switch (int switchnum, int prefix_length)
/* If we already processed this switch and determined if it was
live or not, return our past determination. */
if (switches[switchnum].live_cond != 0)
return switches[switchnum].live_cond > 0;
return ((switches[switchnum].live_cond & SWITCH_LIVE) != 0
&& (switches[switchnum].live_cond & SWITCH_FALSE) == 0);
/* Now search for duplicate in a manner that depends on the name. */
switch (*name)
......@@ -5954,7 +5953,7 @@ check_live_switch (int switchnum, int prefix_length)
}
/* Otherwise the switch is live. */
switches[switchnum].live_cond = SWITCH_LIVE;
switches[switchnum].live_cond |= SWITCH_LIVE;
return 1;
}
......@@ -5969,7 +5968,7 @@ check_live_switch (int switchnum, int prefix_length)
static void
give_switch (int switchnum, int omit_first_word)
{
if (switches[switchnum].live_cond == SWITCH_IGNORE)
if ((switches[switchnum].live_cond & SWITCH_IGNORE) != 0)
return;
if (!omit_first_word)
......@@ -7135,7 +7134,7 @@ used_arg (const char *p, int len)
mswitches
= XNEWVEC (struct mswitchstr, n_mdswitches + (n_switches ? n_switches : 1));
for (i = 0; i < n_switches; i++)
if (switches[i].live_cond != SWITCH_IGNORE)
if ((switches[i].live_cond & SWITCH_IGNORE) == 0)
{
int xlen = strlen (switches[i].part1);
for (j = 0; j < cnt; j++)
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment