Commit 3239dde9 by Richard Sandiford Committed by Richard Sandiford

Avoid matching the same pattern statement twice

r262275 allowed pattern matching on pattern statements.  Testing for
SVE on more benchmarks showed a case where this interacted badly
with 14/n.

The new over-widening detection could narrow a COND_EXPR A to another
COND_EXPR B, which mixed_size_cond could then match.  This was working
as expected.  However, we left B (now dead) in the pattern definition
sequence with a non-null PATTERN_DEF_SEQ.  mask_conversion also
matched B, and unlike most recognisers, didn't clear PATTERN_DEF_SEQ
before adding statements to it.  This meant that the statements
created by mixed_size_cond appeared in two supposedy separate
sequences, causing much confusion.

This patch removes pattern statements that are replaced by further
pattern statements.  As a belt-and-braces fix, it also nullifies
PATTERN_DEF_SEQ on failure, in the same way Richard B. did recently
for RELATED_STMT.

I have patches to clean up the PATTERN_DEF_SEQ handling, but they
only apply after the complete PR85694 sequence, whereas this needs
to go in before 14/n.

2018-07-03  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>

gcc/
	* tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_mark_pattern_stmts): Remove pattern
	statements that have been replaced by further pattern statements.
	(vect_pattern_recog_1): Clear STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ on failure.

gcc/testsuite/
	* gcc.dg/vect/vect-mixed-size-cond-1.c: New test.

From-SVN: r262332
parent 30f502ed
2018-07-03 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
* tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_mark_pattern_stmts): Remove pattern
statements that have been replaced by further pattern statements.
(vect_pattern_recog_1): Clear STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ on failure.
2018-07-03 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_is_simple_use): Consolidate dumping,
......
2018-07-03 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-mixed-size-cond-1.c: New test.
2018-07-02 Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>
* gcc.target/riscv/interrupt-debug.c: New.
......
/* { dg-do compile } */
int
f (unsigned char *restrict x, short *restrict y)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{
unsigned short a = (x[i] + 11) >> 1;
unsigned short b = (x[i] + 42) >> 2;
unsigned short cmp = y[i] == 0 ? a : b;
int res = cmp + 1;
x[i] = res;
}
}
......@@ -4295,6 +4295,9 @@ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple *orig_stmt, gimple *pattern_stmt,
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (orig_stmt, orig_def_seq);
gsi_insert_seq_before_without_update (&gsi, def_seq, GSI_SAME_STMT);
gsi_insert_before_without_update (&gsi, pattern_stmt, GSI_SAME_STMT);
/* Remove the pattern statement that this new pattern replaces. */
gsi_remove (&gsi, false);
}
else
vect_set_pattern_stmt (pattern_stmt, orig_stmt_info, pattern_vectype);
......@@ -4358,6 +4361,8 @@ vect_pattern_recog_1 (vect_recog_func *recog_func,
if (!is_pattern_stmt_p (stmt_info))
STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (stmt_info) = NULL;
}
/* Clear any half-formed pattern definition sequence. */
STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (stmt_info) = NULL;
return;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment