re PR sanitizer/89869 (-fsanitize=undefined miscompilation)

	PR sanitizer/89869
	* typeck.c: Include gimplify.h.
	(cp_build_modify_expr) <case COND_EXPR>: Unshare rhs before using it
	for second time.  Formatting fixes.

	* g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-14.C: New test.

From-SVN: r270024

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

+2019-03-29  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+	PR sanitizer/89869
+	* typeck.c: Include gimplify.h.
+	(cp_build_modify_expr) <case COND_EXPR>: Unshare rhs before using it
+	for second time.  Formatting fixes.
+
 2019-03-29  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
 
 	PR c++/89876 - ICE with deprecated conversion.

gcc/cp/typeck.c

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "stringpool.h"
 #include "attribs.h"
 #include "asan.h"
+#include "gimplify.h"
 
 static tree cp_build_addr_expr_strict (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
 static tree cp_build_function_call (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
@@ -8129,8 +8130,6 @@ cp_build_modify_expr (location_t loc, tree lhs, enum tree_code modifycode,
 	/* Produce (a ? (b = rhs) : (c = rhs))
 	   except that the RHS goes through a save-expr
 	   so the code to compute it is only emitted once.  */
-	tree cond;
-
 	if (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhs)))
 	  {
 	    if (complain & tf_error)
@@ -8145,13 +8144,21 @@ cp_build_modify_expr (location_t loc, tree lhs, enum tree_code modifycode,
 	if (!lvalue_or_else (lhs, lv_assign, complain))
 	  return error_mark_node;
 
-	cond = build_conditional_expr
-	  (input_location, TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 0),
-	   cp_build_modify_expr (loc, TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 1),
-				 modifycode, rhs, complain),
-	   cp_build_modify_expr (loc, TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 2),
-				 modifycode, rhs, complain),
-           complain);
+	tree op1 = cp_build_modify_expr (loc, TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 1),
+					 modifycode, rhs, complain);
+	/* When sanitizing undefined behavior, even when rhs doesn't need
+	   stabilization at this point, the sanitization might add extra
+	   SAVE_EXPRs in there and so make sure there is no tree sharing
+	   in the rhs, otherwise those SAVE_EXPRs will have initialization
+	   only in one of the two branches.  */
+	if (sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_UNDEFINED
+			      | SANITIZE_UNDEFINED_NONDEFAULT))
+	  rhs = unshare_expr (rhs);
+	tree op2 = cp_build_modify_expr (loc, TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 2),
+					 modifycode, rhs, complain);
+	tree cond = build_conditional_expr (input_location,
+					    TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 0), op1, op2,
+					    complain);
 
 	if (cond == error_mark_node)
 	  return cond;

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

 2019-03-29  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
 
+	PR sanitizer/89869
+	* g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-14.C: New test.
+
 	PR c/89872
 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr89872.c: New test.
 

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-14.C

+// PR sanitizer/89869
+// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-options "-fsanitize=vptr -fno-sanitize-recover=vptr" }
+
+struct S { S *s = 0; virtual ~S () {} };
+
+void
+foo (S *x, S *y)
+{
+  (x->s ? y : x) = x->s;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  S a;
+  foo (&a, 0);
+}