Commit 275a4187 by Steven Bosscher Committed by Steven Bosscher

re PR rtl-optimization/17513 (ICE: verify_flow_info failed after gcse)

        PR tree-optimization/17513
	* cfgexpand.c (construct_init_block): Clear EDGE_EXECUTABLE
	for successors of the entry block.

	* gcc.dg/20040916-1.c: New test.

From-SVN: r87632
parent b355f222
2004-09-17 Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/17513
* cfgexpand.c (construct_init_block): Clear EDGE_EXECUTABLE
for successors of the entry block.
2004-09-17 Uros Bizjak <uros@kss-loka.si>
PR rtl-optimization/15187
......
......@@ -1082,11 +1082,21 @@ static basic_block
construct_init_block (void)
{
basic_block init_block, first_block;
edge e;
edge e = NULL, e2;
for (e2 = ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->succ; e2; e2 = e2->succ_next)
{
/* Clear EDGE_EXECUTABLE. This flag is never used in the backend.
for (e = ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->succ; e; e = e->succ_next)
if (e->dest == ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->next_bb)
break;
For all other blocks this edge flag is cleared while expanding
a basic block in expand_gimple_basic_block, but there we never
looked at the successors of the entry block.
This caused PR17513. */
e2->flags &= ~EDGE_EXECUTABLE;
if (e2->dest == ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->next_bb)
e = e2;
}
init_block = create_basic_block (NEXT_INSN (get_insns ()),
get_last_insn (),
......
2004-09-17 Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/17513
* gcc.dg/20040916-1.c: New test.
2004-09-16 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/17501
......
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
/* PR17513 - we hit a bug where EDGE_EXECUTABLE was not cleared on
successors of the entry block. This lead to a flow verification
error much later in the compilation (after gcse). */
typedef unsigned char uint8;
typedef unsigned int uint32;
uint32 marker = 0;
uint8 *buff = 0;
uint32 bsize = 0;
extern int foo (void);
uint32
bar (void)
{
int len, d;
for (;;)
{
if (foo () == 0)
return (0);
switch (marker)
{
case 0xfe:
{
len |= (*buff++);
bsize -= 2;
while (len > 0)
{
d = *buff++;
len--;
}
}
break;
default:
break;
}
}
}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment